When you say 'speed', do you mean development time or runtime? If the
former, Apache's wins. If the latter, the speed is going to depend
much more heavily on what you the programmer write (regardless of
which package you choose) and on network conditions at the time you
run.
That said, lots of
Thanks for all the reply.
On Sep 15, 3:39 pm, Filip Havlicek havlicek.fi...@gmail.com wrote:
You can do that with URLConnection too of course, although it takes a little
bit more effort to make it work.
Best regards,
Filip Havlicek
2010/9/16 Frank Weiss fewe...@gmail.com
For simple
Yes, we know why. Because Apache's HttpClient (and other closely
assoc. classes in the org.apache.http package) is a much better API
than Sun's own HttpUrlConnection (and the rest of java.net's Http
support). You can do far more work with less code, and it reads much
better too.
So, for example,
How about speed? which one is fast?
On Sep 15, 5:59 pm, Indicator Veritatis mej1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yes, we know why. Because Apache's HttpClient (and other closely
assoc. classes in the org.apache.http package) is a much better API
than Sun's own HttpUrlConnection (and the rest of java.net's
4 matches
Mail list logo
