Hi koala,
In my non-expert opinion you have two options, none of which are easy, but
both look quite feasible.
The first is to take inspiration from libraries like SwingWT, which is a
port of the Swing API on top of SWT. This is worth doing if you already have
invested in a Swing desktop client.
Thanks Daniel
Your response is more in line of what i was expecting...
On Feb 4, 6:18 pm, Daniel Drozdzewski
wrote:
> Koala,
>
> Try this for
> starters:http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4491720/why-android-is-built-on-a-...
>
> and follow various pointer that appear there (like the video from
nope, i don't think a web-page that loads a java-applet will be
displayed on an Android browser. You'll probably get a warning/message/
text that the incorrect JRE is loaded.
On Feb 4, 6:47 pm, Indicator Veritatis wrote:
> Applets running under Android: but don't we already have that in the
> bro
Applets running under Android: but don't we already have that in the
browser on every Android phone? That runs applets. What more could you
want?
On Feb 3, 10:56 pm, koala wrote:
> Okay, seems that i don't know what i am talking about but you know
> that i don't know what i am talking about.
>
>
Koala,
Try this for starters:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4491720/why-android-is-built-on-a-vm-dalvik
and follow various pointer that appear there (like the video from
Google I/O 2008). It should shed some light on why there was a need to
rewrite JVM for speed and small memory footprint.
Hi guy,
I'm just now looking at this problem: how to run a Java applet (j2se)
on Android!
Surely a phone is small, but now we have 10" pads running android,
or netbook running android ... (the toshiba AC100 for example is a
dual
core ARM9 running at 1GHz).
I do not think that the power is a prob
Yes, it would be really convenient if Android supported Java EE spec.
It would also be really great if it supported all the other Java specs,
like Java 3D, Swing, AWT, RMI...
And .Net applications. And native Windows x86 applications (including 64
bit executables). And MacOS applications (inc
What about for tablet users?
would that be such a nightmare too?
So, If we have to develop an enterprise application are android
devices so unable to deliver such?
would it not be handy if android supported all Java SE functionality?
including rmi, swing, etc?
The fact that it supports it does
Why?
Okay, how about running applets on the andorid browser? what's the
forum to raise that?
On Jan 19, 4:37 pm, viktor wrote:
> I think you should change the forum. For example Spring, Java WEB
> development but notAndroid.
>
> On 14 Січ, 16:16, koala wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > For god sake,
Okay, seems that i don't know what i am talking about but you know
that i don't know what i am talking about.
Now see if you know how to make me know what i am talking about too.
But even if i don't know what i am talking about I guess i do know
what I want to know
Okay, how about running ap
How much bigger is OpenJDK / Harmony than the Android JRE?
What is 'all the crap' in Java SE that you would never want to see on
the Android?
On Jan 22, 12:28 am, Brill Pappin wrote:
> Yah, because I want that giant VM with all its crap on my phone.
> I also want to fragment the platform even
Yes,
that was my question, how far are we from running a lightweight linux
kernel with support for OpenJDK / (or Harmony if that makes android
developers happy) on mobile devices?
On Jan 21, 9:43 am, gjs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It might raise the stakes/ire with the O company, but if itsopenJDK,
> th
I didn't say a full j2ee stack, i said OpenJDK (the 'full Java SE
stack').
And yes, in my case we have been asked to develop an enterprise
desktop client that talks to remote EJBs. Our customers are asking for
an Ipad Application, I thought android would be more open / portable,
Yet it seems that
That comment does not help me
On Jan 19, 4:37 pm, viktor wrote:
> I think you should change the forum. For example Spring, Java WEB
> development but notAndroid.
>
> On 14 Січ, 16:16, koala wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > For god sake,
>
> > how convenient would it be to haveOpenJDKrunning onandroid?
>
Yah, because I want that giant VM with all its crap on my phone.
I also want to fragment the platform even further and give Oracle control
over it.
- Brill Pappin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, se
Hi,
It might raise the stakes/ire with the O company, but if its openJDK,
that's alright.
But then you might as well be running a full desktop OS on the phone.
Phone's will be capable of this during 2011 and beyond, particularly
with VM's.
Regards
On Jan 21, 4:41 am, Jake Basile wrote:
> It w
It would be very convenient for developers, and a nightmare for phone users.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
> Imagine if we could run swing, rmi, if we could run all java code as
> it is, we could run enterprise application clients. We could have
> android apps running on the desktop and on the phone.
Great idea.
why think small ? I need a full J2EE stack to use EJB to manage
distributed transactions a
I think you should change the forum. For example Spring, Java WEB
development but not Android.
On 14 Січ, 16:16, koala wrote:
> For god sake,
>
> how convenient would it be to have OpenJDK running on android?
>
> Imagine if we could run swing, rmi, if we could run all java code as
> it is, we co
19 matches
Mail list logo
