Thanks!
Since you Android guys beat me with good I have no choice but to also
subscribe android-discuss where I'll transfer my
non-development-related rants :)
Cheers,
Stoyan
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:39 PM, fadden wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 10:30 am, Stoyan Damov wrote:
>> Now that I'm calm I re
On Feb 12, 10:30 am, Stoyan Damov wrote:
> Now that I'm calm I realize in my 1st post I sound like a complete jerk.
It happens. We forgive you. :-)
Some tips for the next time you see this:
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss/browse_thread/thread/fa79b405ecb5fb51/dd459d306003915a#d
On 2/12/09, Disconnect wrote:
> I hesitated a lot before sending this, because frankly your original
> attitude sucked. Not "this is really annoying" sucked, but more "omg you are
> all idiots for putting such crap out into the world" sucked..
>
> That said, you cannot remove myfaves (and have a
I hesitated a lot before sending this, because frankly your original
attitude sucked. Not "this is really annoying" sucked, but more "omg you are
all idiots for putting such crap out into the world" sucked..
That said, you cannot remove myfaves (and have a functional phone) - it is
tied deeply int
>>Hang on, I am grateful too. You sounded like "I'm grateful as opposed
>>to people like Stoyan" which can't be farther from the truth.
To me, gratitude includes taking the appropriate tone when asking for
help from someone who is not directly responsible for a situation, and
not directly obliga
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Sundog wrote:
>
> Romain,
>
> Just a quick "thank you" to you and others, especially Dianne, who
> field such things. Most of us are very grateful for your hard work and
> patience.
>
Hang on, I am grateful too. You sounded like "I'm grateful as opposed
to people
Yeah. Thank you.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Sundog wrote:
>
> Romain,
>
> Just a quick "thank you" to you and others, especially Dianne, who
> field such things. Most of us are very grateful for your hard work and
> patience.
>
> On Feb 12, 9:54 am, Romain Guy wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> First
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Romain Guy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> First of all, please calm down, getting angry and cursing won't help.
Calm. Won't curse anybody, can't deny me to be angry :)
>
> Then, you are not reading the logs correctly. While the GC should
> certainly not be active all the ti
Romain,
Just a quick "thank you" to you and others, especially Dianne, who
field such things. Most of us are very grateful for your hard work and
patience.
On Feb 12, 9:54 am, Romain Guy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, please calm down, getting angry and cursing won't help.
>
> Then, you are not
Hi,
First of all, please calm down, getting angry and cursing won't help.
Then, you are not reading the logs correctly. While the GC should
certainly not be active all the time, the logs show that the GC is
active in *different processes.* All the GCs you see do not come from
the same process an
I saw that last part, where the device is sending a message too a couple of
days ago.
I am not in the US and not using T-Mobile. As far as I can tell, the SMS
seems to be the myfaves application trying to communicate with the T-Mobile
servers via some proprietary protocol. I suppose the device has
11 matches
Mail list logo
