There seems to be a lot of uncertainty about when it will be available
for app submission, hence why alternatives are being made available.
Al.
--
http://andappstore.com/
Christine wrote:
> I assume that the Google app market will be available soon? Does
> anyone know? Can I submit an app?
>
>
I assume that the Google app market will be available soon? Does
anyone know? Can I submit an app?
On Oct 3, 3:37 pm, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AndAppStore.com now generates version information which can be used by
> the veecheck updating library.
>
> More information is available
I assume that the Google app market will be available soon? Does
anyone know? Can I submit an app?
On Oct 3, 3:37 pm, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AndAppStore.com now generates version information which can be used by
> the veecheck updating library.
>
> More information is available
AndAppStore.com now generates version information which can be used by
the veecheck updating library.
More information is available from
http://andappstore.com/AndroidPhoneApplications/veecheck.jsp
plusminus wrote:
> Will you provide a auto-updating feature for apps?
>
> On 2 Okt., 15:27, Al S
Because it's available and because I don't impose certification
requirements :).
There seems to be a lot of uncertainty over what will be required for
the Google and/or T-Mobile app stores, so I'm attempting to put
something together which will be open to all and leave the user to
decide what
naah...
You can use self-signed certificates to sign your applications. No
certificate authority is needed.
http://code.google.com/android/intro/develop-and-debug.html#signing
On Oct 3, 1:23 pm, Yalcin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> self-signed certification for .apk?
>
> how to do it? do we need
self-signed certification for .apk?
how to do it? do we need a certification authority like Thawte or
others and pay for them 200-300 $.
On Oct 3, 10:06 am, hackbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 3, 12:09 am, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Because it's available and because I d
On Oct 3, 12:09 am, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because it's available and because I don't impose certification
> requirements :).
The Android Market won't impose certification requirements, any more
than the normal self-signed certification that is required for
any .apk to be installe
I'm going to start a conversation with the author of
http://www.tomgibara.com/android/veecheck/ to see if andappstore.com can
generate data that his library can use.
Until the emulator gets the unknown source installation fixed I can't
see an easy way of testing updates.
plusminus wrote:
> Wi
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:40 PM, plusminus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ... and why should we be using your store rather than the Android
> Market ?
>
> On 2 Okt., 20:39, plusminus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Will you provide a auto-updating feature for apps?
>
I can't comment on the andappsto
... and why should we be using your store rather than the Android
Market ?
On 2 Okt., 20:39, plusminus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will you provide a auto-updating feature for apps?
>
> On 2 Okt., 15:27, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've put together a quick first pass at an applic
Will you provide a auto-updating feature for apps?
On 2 Okt., 15:27, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've put together a quick first pass at an application store/directory
> which could be useful if T-Mobile and/or Google have problems setting
> up their respective app markets or introduce
12 matches
Mail list logo
