On Monday, May 23, 2011 2:30:11 PM UTC+1, Spooky wrote:
> And yes it is still recommended practice to get a copy of them
> > into your app, in case they might get removed in some new
> > Android version.
>
> Just my opinion here, obviously, but shouldn't the SDK sample
> code be using icons fr
On May 23, 6:30 am, MarcoAndroid wrote:
> Here's the most recent official platform versions distribution:
> http://developer.android.com/resources/dashboard/platform-versions.html
That's the "newer" one that I referred to (at least, I think I
did). I printed it out last week, along with a page s
On 23 May 2011 12:33, Spooky wrote:
> On May 22, 11:57 pm, Zsolt Vasvari wrote:
> > First of all, I would think very seriously about not building a new
> > app that supports 1.5 in the middle of 2011.
>
> HonestlyI'm not so sure that I'm going to now. I'd seen (and
> asked
> about this in t
Here's the most recent official platform versions distribution:
http://developer.android.com/resources/dashboard/platform-versions.html
1.5 + 1.6 = 5.3% so not that much anymore these days. If your app is
quite basic (not using any fancy 1.6+ SDK functionality), you might as
well still support 1.5
On May 22, 11:57 pm, Zsolt Vasvari wrote:
> First of all, I would think very seriously about not building a new
> app that supports 1.5 in the middle of 2011.
HonestlyI'm not so sure that I'm going to now. I'd seen (and
asked
about this in the Android Forums/"Lounge" forum about a week ago--
First of all, I would think very seriously about not building a new
app that supports 1.5 in the middle of 2011.
1.5 doesn't support screen densities, so all resources must be in
"drawable." So if you want to support 1.5+, keep your MDPI resources
is drawable and then create an HDPI folder if you
6 matches
Mail list logo
