and as a final corollary to this, IMHO, Resources.getValue() should
be passing context.getPackageName() instead of null, or the
AssetManager should default it this way.
fixed in 2.x?
aha, it seems that i do have to provide a fully qualified package
name for the call to work.
interestingly
aha, it seems that i do have to provide a fully qualified package
name for the call to work.
interestingly i find that in the source, getValue() calls
getIdentifier() with a null package name, explaining a few things.
i'm still on 1.6, is this a problem, and has it been fixed in later version
2 matches
Mail list logo