On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Doug wrote:
> If everyone reading this thread just took the time to mark spam apps as
> "inappropriate" (then "Other objection" -> type "Spam") using the market,
> might that cause anyone running the market to take notice?
>
Nope. There was an experiment that some
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Albert wrote:
> Surely Google could come up with a even better system, right?
Google could do a lot of brain-dead simple, common sense things that would
be fairly easy to implement and vastly improve the Market that for
inexplicable reasons they never do or take
On 08/06/2010 08:15 PM, samspade79 wrote:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:07 PM, samspade79 wrote:
Firstly, someone said a "real" developer cannot do more than a few apps.
Please quote whomever said this, I'm not seeing it in the thread.
You're right I must have been dreaming. I thought I saw someo
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:07 PM, samspade79 wrote:
> Firstly, someone said a "real" developer cannot do more than a few apps.
>
Please quote whomever said this, I'm not seeing it in the thread.
The only reference I see to the word "real" is "Any real developer could
afford $1 to update the app"
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Maps.Huge.Info (Maps API Guru) <
cor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would also be a good idea to charge $1 to update as well. Any real
> developer
> could afford $1 to update the app, those who choose to update solely
> to bring their app to the top of the "just in" lis
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Alessandro Pellizzari wrote:
> 25$ is a one time fee. I could then publish 10 apps.
>
I think the likelihood of a single developer publishing 10 useful apps is
very small.
> Reading this thread, I understood that one spammer already has 3 or
> 4 accounts on the
On 08/06/2010 04:51 PM, TreKing wrote:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Alessandro Pellizzari mailto:a...@amiran.it>> wrote:
If I want to write a useful free or open source app without ads, I
am blocked by the cost.
Um ... you're already "blocked" by the cost ...
Follow along with me now:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Alessandro Pellizzari wrote:
> If I want to write a useful free or open source app without ads, I
> am blocked by the cost.
>
Um ... you're already "blocked" by the cost ...
Follow along with me now: currently, you have to pay $25 to sign up as a
developer, yes?
So
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:14 AM, { Devdroid } wrote:
> On 6 August 2010 11:22, a1 wrote:
> > This will not change anything, the biggest problem with spam is that,
> > well, they spam all categories, so adding additional category is
> > pointless. I think that there should be a publisher fee for ea
On 6 August 2010 11:22, a1 wrote:
> This will not change anything, the biggest problem with spam is that,
> well, they spam all categories, so adding additional category is
> pointless. I think that there should be a publisher fee for each app,
> this will stop spam for sure.
That's silly idea an
You should report this at b.android.com.
-- Kostya
06.08.2010 2:06, samspade79 пишет:
A problem I had the other day was an app that once downloaded
subscribed you to SMS alerts @ $2.99 a month. I'm not sure how it
could do this without some kind of user confirmation but it was very
alarming.
O
You should report this at b.android.com.
-- Kostya
06.08.2010 2:06, samspade79 пишет:
A problem I had the other day was an app that once downloaded
subscribed you to SMS alerts @ $2.99 a month. I'm not sure how it
could do this without some kind of user confirmation but it was very
alarming.
O
12 matches
Mail list logo
