Perhaps, a mismatch of title and content.
Kumar Bibek
http://techdroid.kbeanie.com
http://www.kbeanie.com
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mohamed KARAMI wrote:
> *Hi,
>
> I have I9000** with I9000JPJG8 firmeware, Market application work
> perfectly but, i can't find Google maps in the Market
*Hi,
I have I9000** with I9000JPJG8 firmeware, Market application work perfectly
but, i can't find Google maps in the Market, I have found some articles that
says there is a license issue, I used the bar code of maps application, but
Market return no application.
Any ideas.
*
--
You received th
Serializable has higher overhead than Android's similar built-in
interface, Parcelable. Try using Parcelable if possible, and consider
support for Java serialization a fall-back (for compatibility with
legacy and library code).
-- Kostya
28.01.2011 14:44, maccoy пишет:
why not class implemen
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 3:36 AM, maomaostevencao <
maomaosteven...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> What you have said is the common way to pass arguments to an activity.
>
Right.
> But my question is about how to pass an object of user defined class to an
> activity.
>
Passing a user defined object to a
nheritance hierarchy.
_
From: android-developers@googlegroups.com
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of TreKing
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 7:56 AM
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [android-developers] Re: Passing objects to new intents
On Tue, Dec
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:52 PM, maomaostevencao <
maomaosteven...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> If I want to load a new activity and pass some of arguments using this
> way, I have to get the reference of this new activity, but seems platform
> doesn't provide any API to get it. How can you do it? I mea
m
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of TreKing
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 5:35 AM
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [android-developers] Re: Passing objects to new intents
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Neilz wrote:
1) This is useful as you can put a lot of c
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Neilz wrote:
> 1) This is useful as you can put a lot of common methods and vars in
> there,,,
>
As Mark said you can't really do this if you use any of the derived Activity
classes (List, Tab, and especially Map). For this kind of "common activity
stuff" I create
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Neilz wrote:
> Now maybe this is obvious, but I must say I haven't seen this in any
> other examples. I'm wondering if there's something 'wrong' with this,
> any reason why this shouldn't be done?
1. Watch for memory leaks. Do not put things in static contexts tha
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Doug wrote:
>
> Parcelable is not such a headache once you get the boilerplate code out of
> the way.
>
It's not only the repetitive "CREATOR" stuff. I found that if I send a
custom parcelable to a Service which was to start after my main Activity had
gone away, l
10 matches
Mail list logo
