In latest code, glad to see liba2dp.so no longer dynamically links
against two GPL libraries, libbluetooth.so and libhcid.so. Also see
the clean up version of GPL header files bluetooth.h, sco.h and
rfcomm.h inside device\system\bluetooth\bluez-clean-headers
\bluetooth.
Thanks to Nick's effort for
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Andy Quan wrote:
> Dave/Nick et al,
> Many thanks for your informative answers!
>
> I have very limited understanding about the "infection nature" of GPL. In
> my understanding, as long as one of the source files or linked dynamic
> libs used to build certain lib
Dave/Nick et al,
Many thanks for your informative answers!
I have very limited understanding about the "infection nature" of GPL. In my
understanding, as long as one of the source files or linked dynamic
libs used to build certain lib is infected by GPL, the rest part, no matter
it is inside that
Also, the SBC encoder is LPGL not GPL.
Nick
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Dave Sparks wrote:
>
> The BlueZ stack was deliberately isolated to accommodate the GPL
> license requirements without affecting the rest of the source code.
>
> On Apr 21, 2:36 pm, Jean-Baptiste Queru wrote:
> > Indee
The BlueZ stack was deliberately isolated to accommodate the GPL
license requirements without affecting the rest of the source code.
On Apr 21, 2:36 pm, Jean-Baptiste Queru wrote:
> Indeed, bluez is a rare part of Android that is licensed under the GPL.
>
> JBQ
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:
Indeed, bluez is a rare part of Android that is licensed under the GPL.
JBQ
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Ravi wrote:
>
> Bumping this up.
>
> Can someone from Google please comment on this?
>
> -Ravi
>
> On Apr 20, 12:56 am, Ravi wrote:
>> I do see the GPL license. That's bizarre. I was un
Bumping this up.
Can someone from Google please comment on this?
-Ravi
On Apr 20, 12:56 am, Ravi wrote:
> I do see the GPL license. That's bizarre. I was under the impression
> that the entire android tree has to be provided with the Apache
> license. Maybe someone from Google can confirm.
>
>
I do see the GPL license. That's bizarre. I was under the impression
that the entire android tree has to be provided with the Apache
license. Maybe someone from Google can confirm.
Just fyi...PacketVideo has provided their version of the SBC encoder
already as part of OpenCORE [external/opencore/
Hi,
As far as I remember, BlueZ is released under GPL license. Is this the same
in android? If so, does this mean if I want to integrate my customized SBC
encoder lib into this framework, I have to make my encoder open source?
--
Thanks,
Andy
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
