true
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Mike Lockwood wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:05 PM, hedwin wrote:
>> I actually don't mind whether it is 2.6.32 or 2.6.35 that is being used.
>> The thing is there is a dependency between the kernel version and
>> bionic, right?
>
> Actually the dependenc
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:05 PM, hedwin wrote:
> I actually don't mind whether it is 2.6.32 or 2.6.35 that is being used.
> The thing is there is a dependency between the kernel version and
> bionic, right?
Actually the dependency in this case is between the kernel and the
vold daemon. bionic is
I actually don't mind whether it is 2.6.32 or 2.6.35 that is being used.
The thing is there is a dependency between the kernel version and
bionic, right?
So when things go wrong it triggers me thinking I might have used the
wrong kernel version, that's what happend
when I treid using 2.6.32 (the on
Froyo uses kernel 2.6.32, and the master branch (which is froyo +
various external contributions) also uses 2.6.32. Since this is
confusing and people seem to want to use 2.6.35, I'll see if we can
integrate the userspace changes needed for 2.6.35 into the master
branch.
Mike
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010
Mike,
Sorry asking an ever recurring question, but is 2.6.32 the kernel
version intended for froyo version in the android.git.kernel.org
master branch or is this 2.6.35.
Hedwin
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Mike Lockwood wrote:
> Hi Pankaj,
>
> For the next android release after Froyo we will
Hi Pankaj,
For the next android release after Froyo we will be using new
notifications between kernel and userspace. The userspace changes
have not been released yet and are not included in Froyo. So for
Froyo you should continue using the 2.6.32 kernel. The android 2.6.35
kernel is for post-Fr
