[android-porting] Re: Android and Memory consumption

2009-03-03 Thread F H
Thanks Dianne, Really to confirm the amount of memory an Android device needs to have in the up & coming months. A minimum hardware requirements doc I've seen implies 128Mb is enough - though that seems a bit tight. Knowing it's not going to go down helps the decision process. On Mon, Mar 2, 20

[android-porting] Re: STL library in Android

2009-03-03 Thread F H
It was faster to remove our STL dependencies for now, so it's on a back-boiler. It would be helpful to know the rough timeline of an improved STL port. On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Archer wrote: > > And F H, did you manage to use STLport in Android? > > Thanks, > Archer > - Show quoted text

[android-porting] I want To Port Android On My Motoroal A810

2009-03-03 Thread Sandeep
Hi I am new to this group. I want to Port Android On My Motorola A810 Please Tell me to how to do this. Also Please tell me About cons and prons of android on a810. Thanking You Sandeep Bhor India --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ unsubscribe: android-porting+unsubscr...@go

[android-porting] Re: STL library in Android

2009-03-03 Thread David Turner
Sorry, but there is no ETA on STL right now; this is something that will likely appear after the first public release of the NDK. By the way, the list android-...@googlegroups.com has been created to specifically discuss native code support for application developers (as opposed as platform hacker

[android-porting] Re: Android Market and Market application

2009-03-03 Thread mvniekerk
Yeah, bump from my side of things as well. On Mar 2, 6:10 pm, F H wrote: > How does a product manufacturer gain access the Android Market? > Is it possible to download the applications for testing purposes? > Does the provisioning system present all Android applications or only those > that have

[android-porting] Re: Android Market and Market application

2009-03-03 Thread Ludwig
I think you have to realise that the Android Market is not part of Android, the open source project, but a commercial enterprise run by Google to which currently only owners of officially distributed phones have access (the market app is not open source). So if you would need to have access to mark

[android-porting] Re: Libraries and Services Questions

2009-03-03 Thread David Turner
Very likely not, but it really depends on whay your driver does, so it's not possible to answer your question. It is also likely that upcoming versions of the platforms will run on 2.6.27 instead of 2.6.25. Again, YMMV On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:10 AM, asyen wrote: > > Dear All: > > My kernel is

[android-porting] Wholesale/retail apparel sports shoes,caps....

2009-03-03 Thread 爸爸
just take you few minutes to look here. If you are interested in any of these products,just feel free to inquire us. We will be glad to provide more details for you. we take PAYPAL as the method of payment! please kindly visite our website: http://www.cnnshoe.com msn: cnnshoe2...@hotmail.com emai

[android-porting] Re: eee_701

2009-03-03 Thread liuhy
can you give more details? On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Luca Belluccini wrote: > > I'm testing Android on a eee_701 and VMWare appliance. > Both are giving me android.process.acore has stopped ... error. > Any hint? > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ unsubscribe: andr

[android-porting] Re: Camera Parameters

2009-03-03 Thread steve2641
I'm not really interested in someone else's Camera HAL implementation, I have my own. What I'm interested in is making sure I stay in sync with the potential future list of camera parameters. For instance, say I want to add a new feature to control flash, so in my implementation I add a "flash-m

[android-porting] Re: Android Market and Market application

2009-03-03 Thread F H
Thanks Ludwig, I'm mostly asking from a device creators viewpoint. One of the attractions of Android is the ability to access the Market and download content. What I don't know is what the process is that enables a device to gain access to this...certification, testing, how the provisioning works

[android-porting] Re: STL library in Android

2009-03-03 Thread Archer
OK, thanks for the info, David and F H. Archer On Mar 3, 2:07 am, David Turner wrote: > Sorry, but there is no ETA on STL right now; this is something that will > likely appear after the first public release of the NDK. > > By the way, the list android-...@googlegroups.com has been created to >

[android-porting] Re: bluetooth on/off from UI

2009-03-03 Thread Nick Pelly
BluetoothEventLoop has an instance of BluetoothDeviceService which you could call disable() on. On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:11 PM, pavan savoy wrote: > Hey Nick, > > I am kind a stuck in here, find attached the patch... > I got the AdapterRemoved Signal, from dbus.. I sent it out to > EventLoop ov

[android-porting] Re: bluetooth on/off from UI

2009-03-03 Thread pavan savoy
Yeah tried that ... Android restarted !!!. On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Nick Pelly wrote: > > BluetoothEventLoop has an instance of BluetoothDeviceService which you > could call disable() on. > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:11 PM, pavan savoy > wrote: > > Hey Nick, > > > > I am kind a stuc

[android-porting] Re: Android Market and Market application

2009-03-03 Thread Sayiram K N
Hi Ludwig how about the protocol stacks?? say for MSM7xx series if i want EDGE/GSM stacks for MSM series chipsets,are they part of the android open source?? if so how to and where to get those. any idea on these. Sayiram On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:01 PM, F H wrote: > Thanks Ludwig, > > I'm mo

[android-porting] Re: Camera Parameters

2009-03-03 Thread may
"Qualcomm and Zoom has got its own HAL implementation for camera." I just check out Qualcomm's camera HAL code from http://android.git.kernel.org/platform/hardware/msm7k.git/libcamera. I can't find Zoom's code.Would you tell me where I can get Zoom's code? I have installed Android on My EPC701.B

[android-porting] Re: Camera Parameters

2009-03-03 Thread Dave Sparks
I agree, Steve. We're getting ready for another round of improvements to the camera for the next release after Cupcake. If you have suggestions for parameters you think should be standardized, please let me know. On Mar 3, 5:37 am, steve2641 wrote: > I'm not really interested in someone else's