[android-porting] Is there any guideline for Android Porting?

2011-10-27 Thread Leo
Hi all: I got the devkit8000 and want to port the android to this board. I'm very interested in these work. please help me, thanks very much. B.R Leo -- unsubscribe: android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting

Re: [android-porting] Help me download the Android source

2011-10-27 Thread bord...@gmail.com
- You need to get the latest version of the repo tool: curl https://dl-ssl.google.com/dl/googlesource/git-repo/repo > ~/bin/repo - You need to initialize a new

[android-porting] android building error multiple definition of '_start'

2011-10-27 Thread bord...@gmail.com
border@b0rder:~$ cat /etc/issue Ubuntu 11.04 \n \l border@b0rder:~$ uname -a Linux b0rder 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux PLATFORM_VERSION_CODENAME=REL PLATFORM_VERSION=2.3.4 TARGET_PRODUCT=ge

[android-porting] Android-x86 compilation error

2011-10-27 Thread babuvenkates...@gmail.com
Hi, i downloaded android x86 source code. while trying to compile its giving errors.. like as follows... 1. $TARGET_ARCH=x86 TARGET_PRODUCT=generic_x86 DISABLE_DEXPREOPT=true make -j2 installer_img then its giving as .. PLATFORM_VERSION_CODENAME=AOSP PLATFORM_VERSION=AOSP TARGET_PRODUCT=generic

Re: [android-porting] android building error multiple definition of '_start'

2011-10-27 Thread Cheryala Venu Madhav
Do a clean build. Looks like you have copied over the source from one location to other and instead of overwriting it has copied in to the folder. Do a clean build or else delete the source and copy it once again. /Venu On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 2:19 PM, bord...@gmail.com wrote: > border@b0rder:

Re: [android-porting] Binder thread migration

2011-10-27 Thread Nitin Mahajan
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Dianne Hackborn wrote: > The thread priority propagation is just...  well, to have the thread > executing the IPC to run at the same priority as the thread sending it.  So > the work being down is scheduled at the same importance as the thread > wanting to have tha