[android-porting] Re: How to use external modem in emulator

-verbose -debug all >>>>>>>> and from the ADB shell tried echo "ATD1234" > ttyS1 but there is >>>>>>>> nothing happened. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ttyS1 is not connected to the emulated modem at all. Actually, none >>>>>>> of the emulated serial ports are, >>>>>>> so it's not surprising that this doesn't work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> as well itried using the local host 5554 and then gsm call 12344555 >>>>>>>> but got the rror message " KO: Modem Emulation not started" can any >>>>>>>> one help me in this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Probably because the GSM stack tried to talk with your ttyACM0 device >>>>>>> and got answers it could not >>>>>>> parse properly, for some reason. Try "adb logcat -b radio" to display >>>>>>> the radio log, which includes the >>>>>>> AT commands exchanged between the modem and the stack. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sram >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> >> > -- Daniel Baeyens Warp Networks S.L. - http://www.warp.es --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ unsubscribe: android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[android-porting] Re: Using ADB in VirtualBox

ur network configuration (guest IP, type of Virtualbox virtual network, etc), just to be sure... Moreover, check if adbd is launched on your guest host Kind regards, -- Daniel Baeyens Warp Networks S.L. - http://www.warp.es --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ unsubscribe: android-po

Re: [android-porting] Data connection via cell modem (GPRS)

use the default route that is set up via > pppd. Can anybody give me some pointers on what needs to be done to > get Android to use the connection?  Thanks much in advance. Which is the full command you are using for setting the route? Can you explain a little bit more your process? KR -

Re: [android-porting] Re: Data connection via cell modem (GPRS)

ndroid RIL or just via >> init? I am unsure of whether Android will understand that it has a GPRS >> packet data connection without proper handling in the RIL (I don't know if >> setting the above properties is sufficient)... >> >> You should be aware that in later Android re

[android-porting] Re: Problems with GPRS module

Hi, If you are using the default reference RIL, you are going to have plenty of problems as it is quite incomplete. You should develop your own libvendor-ril library to make android work better with your GPRS module (or ask your vendor for it) http://source.android.com/porting/telephony.html Kin

[android-porting] About IMEISV request on libreference-ril

f the GSM module? or the library one? Does it matters? or can I choose randomly a pair of numbers? Thanks and kind regards, -- Daniel Baeyens Warp Networks S.L. - http://www.warp.es --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ unsubscribe: android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com we

[android-porting] Explanation about +CNMI parameters?

S_FROM_SIM)... In case I'm mistaken, could someone explain a little bit how Android works for unsolicited SMS notifications (or SMS in general) and what a new device should do to imitate the original behaviour? Thank you and kind regards, -- Daniel Baeyens Warp Networks S.L. - htt

[android-porting] Re: About IMEISV request on libreference-ril

've seen, there is no standard command to request the IMEISV, but I have found the correct one for the module I'm using for testing. > Best regards, Thanks and kind regards, >  Mikkel > > On Apr 28, 11:35 am, Daniel Baeyens wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm play

[android-porting] Re: Explanation about +CNMI parameters?

to store the arriving SMS, etc...). Probably that will help me to understand why thouse default parameters on CNMI are set like that :) Kind regards, > Regards > Nimit > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Daniel Baeyens wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Playing with t

[android-porting] Re: Explanation about +CNMI parameters?

e SMS URC comes with the full data, its teh responsibilty of RIL to take > that data and then sent it to teh framework. > > Regards > Nimit > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Daniel Baeyens wrote: >> >> Hi Nimit, >> >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Nimit

[android-porting] Re: how to build the pdk_docs target to generate the document of android

(Method.java:585) >> > at com.sun.tools.javadoc.DocletInvoker.invoke >> > (DocletInvoker.java:269) >> > at com.sun.tools.javadoc.DocletInvoker.start >> > (DocletInvoker.java:143) >> > at com.sun.tools.javadoc.Start.parseAndExecut

[android-porting] Setting a default route

ry to make ping or a network connection, I get a "Network is unreachable" error. Am I doing something wrong? How could I do this? Thank you! Kind regards, -- Daniel Baeyens Warp Networks S.L. - http://www.warp.es --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ unsubscribe: androi

[android-porting] Re: RIL implementation

Hi Nimit (and all the list), How did you solve this problem? I think now I'm facing a similar problem. I'm trying to test a 3G USB dongle with Android. For this: - I've needed to discard Android emulator because it doesn't allow to attach USB devices with -qemu -usb -usbdevice parameters (anyon

[android-porting] Re: Setting a default route

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Daniel Baeyens wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to set up a default gateway through a network interface. > I've set up my device (netcfg up && ifconfig ), > and then I have tried to: > > route add default dev > > If i launch "

[android-porting] Re: RIL implementation

Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:02 PM, David Turner wrote: > > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Daniel Baeyens > wrote: >> >> Hi Nimit (and all the list), >> >> How did you solve this problem? >> >> I think now I'm facing a similar problem. I'm tr

[android-porting] Re: RIL implementation

Hi, On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:37 PM, David Turner wrote: > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Baeyens wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for the info >> >> -radio already worked perfect :D . Previously I have been using this >> parameter for testi

[android-porting] Re: RIL implementation

Hi again, On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Daniel Baeyens wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:37 PM, David Turner wrote: >> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Baeyens wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks for the info >>> &