> +1 vote for XHTML Strict explicitly across the board.
>
> I have not found problems with modern browsers with declaring XHTML
> strict on an application and sticking to valid documents.
>
well, I was generating XHTML in the beginning by default, had a few issues
related to XHTML and Javascript s
+1 vote for XHTML Strict explicitly across the board.
I have not found problems with modern browsers with declaring XHTML
strict on an application and sticking to valid documents.
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 08:51 +0200, Thomas Schapitz wrote:
> I just wondered, if the team intended to generate for a
Wouter Zoons schrieb:
> Thomas Schapitz wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>> looking at the messages my mozilla is throwing at the generated HTML
>> (HtmlTidy),
>> I'm wondering what type of HTML this is intended to be?
>>
>> - 4.01 transitional ?
>> - 4.01 strict ?
>> - XHTML 1.0 ?
>>
>> Did you leave out an
Thomas Schapitz wrote:
Hi there,
looking at the messages my mozilla is throwing at the generated HTML
(HtmlTidy),
I'm wondering what type of HTML this is intended to be?
- 4.01 transitional ?
- 4.01 strict ?
- XHTML 1.0 ?
Did you leave out an appropriate declaration intentionally?
Might be an inter
Hi there,
looking at the messages my mozilla is throwing at the generated HTML
(HtmlTidy),
I'm wondering what type of HTML this is intended to be?
- 4.01 transitional ?
- 4.01 strict ?
- XHTML 1.0 ?
Did you leave out an appropriate declaration intentionally?
Might be an interesting feature, to in
