-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans Henry von Tresckow schreef:
> New poodle images now available here:
> http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/unstable/images/poodle/20071130/
That's nice and all, but those aren't the autobuilder images, which we
agreed would be the only thing that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
For some years now we have been statically defining ipkg feeds in distro
configs. This works pretty good, provided you have a fixed set of feeds
and don't make any typos. But we have had typos in them; fixing those
required either a reflash or gui
Koen Kooi wrote:
> Graeme identified some problems with various X headers, Henry wants to
> downgrade the poodle kernel and Rod said we might need to downgrade
> ixp4xx kernels as well.
I have downgraded the ixp4xx kernel to 2.6.21.6, cause the 2.6.23.8
version gives an all-zeros MAC address on th
Koen Kooi wrote:
> For some years now we have been statically defining ipkg feeds in distro
> configs. This works pretty good, provided you have a fixed set of feeds
> and don't make any typos. But we have had typos in them; fixing those
> required either a reflash or guiding the user through editi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rod Whitby schreef:
> Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Graeme identified some problems with various X headers, Henry wants to
>> downgrade the poodle kernel and Rod said we might need to downgrade
>> ixp4xx kernels as well.
>
> I have downgraded the ixp4xx kernel
On Dec 1, 2007 1:35 AM, Koen Kooi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hans Henry von Tresckow schreef:
> > New poodle images now available here:
> > http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/unstable/images/poodle/20071130/
>
> That's nice and all, but those
On Dec 1, 2007 4:36 AM, Koen Kooi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> For some years now we have been statically defining ipkg feeds in distro
> configs. This works pretty good, provided you have a fixed set of feeds
> and don't make any typos.
I just realised that minimal-image.bb doesn't include ipkg, whereas the
first image which does include ipkg (console-image) includes a whole lot
of other stuff which could be installed using ipkg after first boot and
network access, and which make the image too big for a machine with
limited flash
Rod Whitby wrote:
> I just realised that minimal-image.bb doesn't include ipkg, whereas the
> first image which does include ipkg (console-image) includes a whole lot
> of other stuff which could be installed using ipkg after first boot and
> network access, and which make the image too big for a m
