Re: [Angstrom-devel] linux kexec boot mini review

2008-09-08 Thread Andrea Adami
About defconfigs, I see it's just the same layout as /linux/linux-rp-2.6-26. Some major rework is needed, then. In the meanwhile, I opened a bug attaching defconfigs for kexecboot for c7x0, akita and spitz. Kernel sizecheck: passed. http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=4543 Andrea

Re: [Angstrom-devel] linux kexec boot mini review

2008-09-08 Thread Koen Kooi
Andrea Adami wrote: About defconfigs, I see it's just the same layout as /linux/linux-rp-2.6-26. Yes, linux-rp is not the best example for a kernel recipe, but it's certainly not the worst :) regards, Koen Some major rework is needed, then. In the meanwhile, I opened a bug attaching

Re: [Angstrom-devel] linux kexec boot mini review

2008-09-08 Thread Andrea Adami
Random question: It's really easy to make extra uImage files, ... Do you mean uImage *only* for kexecboot? If you refer to http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=4544 , yes, it is really easy. By mistake, I forgot there some bits about kexecboot too... P.S. during initramfs tests, I

Re: [Angstrom-devel] linux kexec boot mini review

2008-09-08 Thread Koen Kooi
Andrea Adami wrote: Random question: It's really easy to make extra uImage files, ... Do you mean uImage *only* for kexecboot? No, I meant that linux-kexec boots generates a zImage *and* uImage at the same time. Warning: horrible linewrap ahead It's a matter of doing DEPENDS +=

Re: [Angstrom-devel] linux kexec boot mini review

2008-09-08 Thread Koen Kooi
Andrea Adami wrote: About defconfigs, I see it's just the same layout as /linux/linux-rp-2.6-26. Some major rework is needed, then. In the meanwhile, I opened a bug attaching defconfigs for kexecboot for c7x0, akita and spitz. Kernel sizecheck: passed.

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Machine mentors for h5000, c7x0, spitz, tosa

2008-09-08 Thread Andrea Adami
ok, so if tosa is happy with 2.6.24 please ad it to the patch here: http://bugs.openembedded.net/attachment.cgi?id=9980 2.6.23 must really disappear... Andrea On 9/8/08, Dmitry Baryshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Junqian Gordon Xu wrote: On 09/05/2008 03:15 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: In

[Angstrom-devel] How to develop for Angstrom

2008-09-08 Thread Laura Arciniega
I used OE framework for the setup of Angstrom linux on my AT91SAM9263EK board. I need to develop some GUI applications for the board using GTK as the basis for the application and I know I can do that with OE and bitbake, but I don't know how, What should I pass to bitbake? can anyone help me?