Re: [Angstrom-devel] failed build of abiword for beagle target

2010-06-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
whoops, bit of a reprieve so let's see how much further i can embarrass myself as i debug a bit further: On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > apart from firefox, this is the only other package that currently > does not build on 64-bit ubuntu. here's the tail end of the > log.do_i

[Angstrom-devel] failed build of abiword for beagle target

2010-06-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
apart from firefox, this is the only other package that currently does not build on 64-bit ubuntu. here's the tail end of the log.do_install file: arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libtool: relink: ccache arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-g++ -march=armv7-a -mtune=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp -sh

Re: [Angstrom-devel] [PATCH] Extra explanation re: md5 file in the ti-cgt6x.inc file

2010-06-02 Thread Gary Thomas
On 06/02/2010 11:14 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02-06-10 15:45, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Make it clear in that include file that the user must manually create the MD5 checksum file. NAK. As I said before, those go into the README Then you should mak

Re: [Angstrom-devel] [PATCH] Extra explanation re: md5 file in the ti-cgt6x.inc file

2010-06-02 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02-06-10 15:45, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > Make it clear in that include file that the user must manually create > the MD5 checksum file. NAK. As I said before, those go into the README > > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day > > --- > > the c

[Angstrom-devel] final two build errors: do_install fails of firefox and abiword

2010-06-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
having cleared up all of the other build failures for the linuxtag image, i'm back to the same two errors i had days ago for the regular beagleboard demo image -- installation failures for both firefox and abiword, and the reason isn't hard to see. here's firefox: sed: couldn't open temporary

[Angstrom-devel] [PATCH] Extra explanation re: md5 file in the ti-cgt6x.inc file

2010-06-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Make it clear in that include file that the user must manually create the MD5 checksum file. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day --- the comment is, of course, innocuous. the only other part is tightening up the variable assignments. diff --git a/recipes/ti/ti-cgt6x.inc b/recipes/ti/ti-cgt6x.i

Re: [Angstrom-devel] current build errors, OE dev branch, beagleboard-linuxtag2010-demo-image

2010-06-02 Thread Gary Thomas
On 06/02/2010 12:58 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 04:24:24PM -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: On 06/01/2010 04:02 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: Yes easily fixable fetch errors, those archives are download restricted and if you open those recipes you will see instruction where to download t

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 07:01:22AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > #$ md5sum ti_cgt_c6000_6.1.9_setup_linux_x86.bin > > > ti_cgt_c6000_6.1.9_setup_linux_x86.bin.md5 > > does it work when md5sum output contains also file name: > > $ md5sum Packages

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 07:01:22AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > #$ md5sum ti_cgt_c6000_6.1.9_setup_linux_x86.bin > > ti_cgt_c6000_6.1.9_setup_linux_x86.bin.md5 does it work when md5sum output contains also file name: $ md5sum Packages d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e Packages $ md5sum P

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
regarding my missing creating an md5 checksum file for ti-cgt6x: On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Koen Kooi wrote: > There's a readme in the same dir: > http://gitorious.org/angstrom/openembedded/blobs/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/ti/README true, but it says nothing about md5 sums. and, anyway, i'll su

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02-06-10 12:48, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 06:08:22AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >>> >>> since this is the first time i actually built an image with any of >>> the downloadab

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 06:48:48AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > yup, that's the issue i must have been having. with the original > > recipe file, i was getting a fetch error, but i overlooked creating > > the .md5 checksum file. i can throw toget

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 06:48:48AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > yup, that's the issue i must have been having. with the original > recipe file, i was getting a fetch error, but i overlooked creating > the .md5 checksum file. i can throw together a patch to clarify that > in the recipe file

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 06:08:22AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > since this is the first time i actually built an image with any of > > the downloadable TI stuff, can i just sanity check what i did? it > > seems to have worked, but i'd rather h

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 06:08:22AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > since this is the first time i actually built an image with any of > the downloadable TI stuff, can i just sanity check what i did? it > seems to have worked, but i'd rather have someone else verify i did it > correctly. > >

[Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
since this is the first time i actually built an image with any of the downloadable TI stuff, can i just sanity check what i did? it seems to have worked, but i'd rather have someone else verify i did it correctly. first step in downloading the contents into my dl dir: $ ls -l ti_* -rw-r--r

Re: [Angstrom-devel] current build errors, OE dev branch, beagleboard-linuxtag2010-demo-image

2010-06-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Martin Jansa wrote: > Robert: If I remember right, you were asked few times to use tinderbox > instead sending many e-mails with pastebins, why didn't you follow this > advise yet? you're right, i'd forgotten about tinderbox. my apologies, i'll use that from now on. and