Re: [Angstrom-devel] compiling a kernel module [solved]

2012-05-25 Thread CB
Hi again addition to my previous message : bitbake -b linux-mainline_3.2.bb -c compile_kernelmodules -f ... seems a better approach to recompile modules after modification HTH Chris Le 23/05/2012 13:09, chrbruno a écrit : Hello, I just tested your kernel workflow I have modified the

[Angstrom-devel] Kernel 3.1.14 usb mount issue on BeagleBone

2012-05-25 Thread Mattias Millbro
Hi all, I'm glad that my previous email to this list lead to a fix of the missing hashes in python-crypt. Unfortunately I'm experiencing a new issue. I'm using my BeagleBone for logging serial data, using the usbserial and ftdi-sio kernel modules. Installing them with opkg will update the

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Kernel 3.1.14 usb mount issue on BeagleBone

2012-05-25 Thread Mattias Millbro
The kernel version I'm talking about is of course 3.2.14. Sorry for that. / M On 05/25/2012 04:39 PM, Mattias Millbro wrote: Hi all, I'm glad that my previous email to this list lead to a fix of the missing hashes in python-crypt. Unfortunately I'm experiencing a new issue. I'm using my

[Angstrom-devel] Trouble building Angstrom for Beaglebone

2012-05-25 Thread Joseph Kubicky
I'm trying to build Angstrom for the Beaglebone. I'm pretty sure I'm using the most recent version of everything. It almost works, but when I run 'MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh bitbake systemd-image', I get an error: | ERROR: Function failed: Fetcher failure for URL: '

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Trouble building Angstrom for Beaglebone

2012-05-25 Thread Jack Mitchell
On 25/05/2012 18:48, Joseph Kubicky wrote: I'm trying to build Angstrom for the Beaglebone. I'm pretty sure I'm using the most recent version of everything. It almost works, but when I run 'MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh bitbake systemd-image', I get an error: | ERROR: Function failed: Fetcher

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Trouble building Angstrom for Beaglebone

2012-05-25 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2012-05-25 15:12, Jack Mitchell wrote: On 25/05/2012 18:48, Joseph Kubicky wrote: I'm trying to build Angstrom for the Beaglebone. I'm pretty sure I'm using the most recent version of everything. It almost works, but when I run 'MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh bitbake systemd-image', I get an

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Trouble building Angstrom for Beaglebone

2012-05-25 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 04:01:49PM -0700, Joseph Kubicky wrote: Thanks. In setup-scripts/sources/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase, I changed the SRC_URI (in netbase_4.47.bb) to use the address you provided and now the build completes. I still get a checksum error (similar to

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Trouble building Angstrom for Beaglebone

2012-05-25 Thread Joseph Kubicky
I tried your idea first, but when I reran the build it just pulled down the earlier (bad) version and wrote over the one I had downloaded. That's why I tried the approach I described. Jay On May 25, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: On Fri, May 25, 2012 at

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Trouble building Angstrom for Beaglebone

2012-05-25 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 05:03:30PM -0700, Joseph Kubicky wrote: I tried your idea first, but when I reran the build it just pulled down the earlier (bad) version and wrote over the one I had downloaded. That's why I tried the approach I described. And did you have the corresponding *.done

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Trouble building Angstrom for Beaglebone

2012-05-25 Thread Joseph Kubicky
I didn't know about .done files. If I create a .done file for a package will bitbake not try to download it? - Jay On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 05:03:30PM -0700, Joseph Kubicky wrote: I tried your idea first, but when I