Re: [Angstrom-devel] ubifs operation in u-boot and Linux with am335x device

2013-10-25 Thread matti kaasinen
2013/10/25 Gary Thomas > >> Unfortunately fixing that to correct value 52 did not help either. >> >> So, I'm running out out ideas. I'll enclose steps I executed both on Linux >> and u-boot side and their outcome. These are from the initial state before >> trying to fix that omap_gpmc.h. >> > > C

Re: [Angstrom-devel] ubifs operation in u-boot and Linux with am335x device

2013-10-25 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2013-10-25 07:07, matti kaasinen wrote: Editing those findings did not help. In fact I was referring a wrong file in my last message. File README.omap3 refers to is: arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/omap_gpmc.h Whereas in my last message I was referring: arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33x/omap_gpm

Re: [Angstrom-devel] ubifs operation in u-boot and Linux with am335x device

2013-10-25 Thread matti kaasinen
Editing those findings did not help. In fact I was referring a wrong file in my last message. File README.omap3 refers to is: arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/omap_gpmc.h Whereas in my last message I was referring: arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33x/omap_gpmc.h However, there was one mistake also in t

Re: [Angstrom-devel] ubifs operation in u-boot and Linux with am335x device

2013-10-25 Thread matti kaasinen
Hi Gary, I think I have found something that could explain this behaviour. They happen to be on u-boot side. In fact I just wrote to u-boot mailin list about this. I'll copy it below: Linux 3.8.13 seems to use 52 ecc bytes mapping them to positions 12..64. Default u-boot set-up found from include

Re: [Angstrom-devel] ubifs operation in u-boot and Linux with am335x device

2013-10-25 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2013-10-25 00:01, matti kaasinen wrote: Hi! Do anyone happen to know how u-boot should be set to access Linux created ubifs partition correctly? I'm working on beaglebone variant board with nand flash addition. Linux side (3.8.13) seems working fine provided that I don't mount it in u-boot si

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Update Angstrom

2013-10-25 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:28 AM, M Pouillot wrote: > Is there a command to update the file system Angstrom without lossing > parameters system and application? what is it you are exactly looking for ? upgrading from which version of angstrom to which one > > best regards, > > Mathieu > > __

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Looking for an Angstrom and bitbake expert to consult / contract

2013-10-25 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Edward Vidal wrote: > Hello Chris, > I have been working with Yocto for beaglebone, beagleboard, pandaboard and > now with the zedboard. I have tried angstrom but found yocto to be a > better approach for me. I would like to emphasize that, Angstrom distribution