Hello angstrom-distro-devel,
From the previous experience, one of the pressing issues with
popularizing an embedded Linux distro was a complex and tangled
installation procedure, which not all users can follow. Other problem
is that some distros give up inherent Linux flexibility and force
users
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> During last few months, myself and other contributors worked on
> bootloading solution which would satisfy the following criteria:
>
> 1. Implemented as a Linux-based user-space application, taking
> advantage of of the contemporary technologies, such as early userspace
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Sokolovsky schreef:
> Hello angstrom-distro-devel,
>
> From the previous experience, one of the pressing issues with
> popularizing an embedded Linux distro was a complex and tangled
> installation procedure, which not all users can follow. Oth
On Dec 12, 2007 8:54 PM, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, based on the above functionality, I'd like to propose it as a
> default bootloading solution for Angstrom, or at least as the default
> solution for PocketPC- and Palm-based devices.
Sounds good!
Cliff
--
=
Hello Koen,
Thursday, December 13, 2007, 9:09:07 AM, you wrote:
[]
>>
>> During last few months, myself and other contributors worked on
>> bootloading solution which would satisfy the following criteria:
>>
>> 1. Implemented as a Linux-based user-space application, taking
>> advantage of of t
Hello Rod,
Thursday, December 13, 2007, 4:06:34 AM, you wrote:
> Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>> During last few months, myself and other contributors worked on
>> bootloading solution which would satisfy the following criteria:
>>
>> 1. Implemented as a Linux-based user-space application, taking
>>
Hello Kevin,
Sunday, December 16, 2007, 1:48:12 AM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 05:52:03PM +0200, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>> So, based on all this, the conclusion can be made that the most
>> problem-free solution for now would be to use loopback-mounted ext2
>> images as mea
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 05:52:03PM +0200, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> So, based on all this, the conclusion can be made that the most
> problem-free solution for now would be to use loopback-mounted ext2
> images as means to install Angstrom on an arbitrary PocketPC device.
I agree with th
Hello Paul,
Friday, December 14, 2007, 5:52:03 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Koen,
> Thursday, December 13, 2007, 9:09:07 AM, you wrote:
> []
>>>
>>> During last few months, myself and other contributors worked on
>>> bootloading solution which would satisfy the following criteria:
>>>
[]
>
