On 02/22/2008 03:30 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
It should be
http://linuxtogo.org/gowiki/Angstrom/Backport_from_dev_to_stable as LTG
wiki is not for Ångström but for all projects. Thats common mistake done
by many people.
Thanks for fixing that. Btw, I've added Paul's comments about
Hello,
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:32:44 +0100
Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[]
| | Speaking of this, I don't see initramfs-bootmenu-image and
| | liveramdisk-image uclibc images available in autobuild/ ,
| | corresponding change made to build-release.sh on 2008-02-06.
Today I | | made
Dnia Friday, 22 of February 2008, Junqian Gordon Xu napisał:
On 02/21/2008 12:13 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
If I had, I'd probably do that too, even though I think that current
process is still an RFC, subject for assessment how performant it is,
and open for proposals for improvements. So,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Sokolovsky schreef:
| Hello,
|
| On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:23:54 -0500
| Junqian Gordon Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| []
| what's the frequency of autobuilding -rX machin/image. If I
| remember correctly, this is every other week.
|
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Koen Kooi schreef:
| Paul Sokolovsky schreef:
| | Hello,
| |
| | On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:23:54 -0500
| | Junqian Gordon Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| |
| | []
| | what's the frequency of autobuilding -rX machin/image. If I
| | remember correctly,
On 02/21/2008 12:13 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
If I had, I'd probably do that too, even though I think that current
process is still an RFC, subject for assessment how performant it is,
and open for proposals for improvements. So, IMHO it would be to just
open a usual wiki page for now.
As invoked in the other discussion about the landmark for closing bug, I
think the current process of getting fixes from .dev -- stable -- feed
leaves a lot to be desired. Here is my 2 cents.
1. We should make the process as transparent as possible to everybody
(even users, so they will hate
