Re: [Angstrom-devel] TI DSP packages

2010-09-01 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 31-08-10 22:33, Gary Thomas wrote: > Why are all the TI DSP packages (.../recipes/ti/*) built in > ${MACHINE_ARCH}? Surely the ones that generate kernel modules > (ti-cmem, ti-dsplink, ti-dmai, ti-linuxutils) should be ${MACHINE_ARCH}, > but can't

Re: [Angstrom-devel] TI DSP packages

2010-08-31 Thread Caglar Akyuz
On Tuesday 31 August 2010 11:33:55 pm Gary Thomas wrote: > Why are all the TI DSP packages (.../recipes/ti/*) built in > ${MACHINE_ARCH}? Surely the ones that generate kernel modules > (ti-cmem, ti-dsplink, ti-dmai, ti-linuxutils) should be ${MACHINE_ARCH}, > but can't the rest (gstreamer-ti, etc)

[Angstrom-devel] TI DSP packages

2010-08-31 Thread Gary Thomas
Why are all the TI DSP packages (.../recipes/ti/*) built in ${MACHINE_ARCH}? Surely the ones that generate kernel modules (ti-cmem, ti-dsplink, ti-dmai, ti-linuxutils) should be ${MACHINE_ARCH}, but can't the rest (gstreamer-ti, etc) be ${FEED_ARCH}? -- --