Its quite obvious but cant seem to find an answer. I am using Angular with Asp.net MVC. I can comfortably write views/templates using Razor and link js file in it for controller. It work fine as user request a page, It get served by Asp.net MVC runtime,js file having angular controller definition also get downloaded and initialized because of ng-controller declaration. Problem starts when I want to do SPA. Then I need to define routes. Now my ask is to simply forward Url as is to ASP.net MVC and it can return a view/template with a reference to angular controller in it, but angular routing forces you to either use pre resolved controller or provide a url to resolve controller.Why not it can simply pick it up from referenced js file. Is there any way by which controller can be picked from the view itself as it has reference to js file having controller definition and also declared inside view using ng-controller. This way we would be able to use excellent convention based ASP.net MVC routing with Angular SPA and will be much simpler for developers having ASP.net MVC background. To summarize, I dont want to specify controller in route config and simply provide template url to get the view which subsequently has the reference to controller ,hence controller should be resolved from there. I would be seriously disappointed if its not possible
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to angular+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to angular@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
