Re: [Anima] Intent per ASA or per AF?

2016-11-20 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 21/11/2016 06:36, Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Michael Richardson [mailto:mcr+i...@sandelman.ca] >> Sent: 20 November 2016 07:42 >> To: Michael Behringer (mbehring) >> Cc: anima@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Anima] Intent per ASA or per AF? >> >> >> Mic

Re: [Anima] Intent per ASA or per AF?

2016-11-20 Thread Michael Behringer (mbehring)
> -Original Message- > From: Michael Richardson [mailto:mcr+i...@sandelman.ca] > Sent: 20 November 2016 07:42 > To: Michael Behringer (mbehring) > Cc: anima@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Anima] Intent per ASA or per AF? > > > Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote: > > One question that just

Re: [Anima] Intent per ASA or per AF?

2016-11-20 Thread Michael Richardson
Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote: > One question that just came up: Should Intent be designed per ASA or > per AF? > My suggestion previously was to segment Intent into sections per > Autonomic Functions. > Example: Intent for the bootstrap function could be: - allow >

Re: [Anima] red/yellow/green lights for bootstrap and ACP feedback

2016-11-20 Thread Michael Richardson
Max Pritikin (pritikin) wrote: > Section 3.1.1. Discovery Supports a backoff mechanisms but on review > I’m thinking the language about final failure to be vague: "Once all > discovered services are attempted the device SHOULD return to Multicast > DNS. It should periodically ret