This version has updates that are supposed to close the open issues discussed
on Monday:
Encryption changed to a MUST implement.
Pointed to guidance on UTF-8 names.
Over to the WG Chairs and AD for the next step.
Regards
Brian, Bing, Carsten
On 31/03/2017 08:16, internet-dra...@ietf.
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and
Approach of the IETF.
Title : A Generic Autonomic Signaling Protocol (GRASP)
Authors : Carsten Bormann
On 31/03/2017 03:50, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2017, at 9:45 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> It would hand out space via HNCP, and if it ran out of space, get more.
>
> This can also be done with DHCP.
Indeed. I'm not trying to force the Anima approach, just pointing out that
it will be ava
Pierre Pfister wrote:
> Absolutely. RFC7695 Applicability Statement (Section 3.) explains that
> the algorithm can be used as
> long as participating nodes gets configured with an eventually
> consistent set of non-overlaping prefixes,
> which are then used to carve-out sub-pr
On Mar 30, 2017, at 9:45 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> It would hand out space via HNCP, and if it ran out of space, get more.
This can also be done with DHCP.
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>>> Could you please clarify what you mean by "negotiate"? Current HNCP
>>> implementations are provided with a bunch of External Prefixes, which
they
>>> then carve into /64, one per prefix. Are you envisioning a scenario
where
>>> the HNCP implement
