On the other hand, maybe it's fundamental, but is relying on LL in this
architecture to go beyond LL boundaries the right thing to do?
On 7/17/17 8:34 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Toerless Eckert wrote:
> > I thought i had asked that question already but not sure, and not seen
> > an
Toerless Eckert wrote:
> I thought i had asked that question already but not sure, and not seen
> an answer: - I have never seen that a device has more than one
> link-local addr on an interface. Is this permitted by IPv6 arck ? Can
> you configure this in eg: Linux. I thought i
Updated to match latest versions of other drafts and fix some mistakes.
This is the version that will be discussed on Wednesday. Sorry about
the short notice.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 17/07/2017 16:13, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line I
It had been agreed when it was decided to put draft-ietf-anima-voucher into
ANIMA rather than NETCONF or 6tisch, that the WGLC would be cross posted.
Unfortunately, this was forgotten.
(I'm reposting since I'm a member of all the lists)
The WGLC is at:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ani
I thought i had asked that question already but not sure, and not seen an
answer:
- I have never seen that a device has more than one link-local addr on an
interface.
Is this permitted by IPv6 arck ? Can you configure this in eg: Linux. I
thought i
tried on linux/cisco-ios in the past and i
On 7/16/17 7:24 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> Sorry, cathing up late with the thread.
>
> Thanks, Eliot. Thats good information. The MAC address based limited
> link-local address space is a problem for devices running a proxy.
> Do you have an idea about some class of devices that has the issue
>
Sorry, cathing up late with the thread.
Thanks, Eliot. Thats good information. The MAC address based limited
link-local address space is a problem for devices running a proxy.
Do you have an idea about some class of devices that has the issue
that you describe and that could be proxies ?
I know a
