Thanks, Owen, inline
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 07:54:48PM +, Owen Friel (ofriel) wrote:
> (some context - I've been talking internally to Max and Eliot about this
> quite a bit)
>
> First, a high level summary of 802.11u-2011 (which is incorporated into
> 802.11-2016) capabilities.
>
> STAs
Owen, thanks for the extensive email... I actually read to the end.
What's this legacy "DHCP" protocol? Does anyone still use it? :-)
I thought IPv4 was an over-the-top service now.. :-) :-)
It seems like you have most of an ID already there... perhaps you'd like to
write something up... since
Peter, Panos and I have been working on this document along with some SID
help from Michel Veillett. We'd like the ANIMA WG to consider adopting it.
There are some SID issues that we hope to work out with the help of the
"y...@ietf.org" list... they are minor technical issues that do not change
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:32:30PM +, Max Pritikin (pritikin) wrote:
> Certificates are a data format for encoding public keys and associated
> certifications (e.g. the CA signature) etc. I think this could reasonably be
> called data needed to establish a cryptographic security association.
(some context - I've been talking internally to Max and Eliot about this quite
a bit)
First, a high level summary of 802.11u-2011 (which is incorporated into
802.11-2016) capabilities.
STAs and APs advertise support for 802.11u by setting the Interworking bit in
the Extended Capabilities IE,
> On Feb 15, 2018, at 10:14 AM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:06:33PM +, Max Pritikin (pritikin) wrote:
b) Key infrastructure
>>>
There is no definition/reference for this term. Please describe on
first use and in terminology. Is
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:06:33PM +, Max Pritikin (pritikin) wrote:
> >> b) Key infrastructure
> >
> >> There is no definition/reference for this term. Please describe on
> >> first use and in terminology. Is there a difference
> >> between "key infrastructure" and "keying material" ?
> On Feb 14, 2018, at 7:45 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>
> Toerless Eckert wrote:
>> 1.2) Terminology:
>
>> a) vendor vs. manufacturer.
>
>> The document uses 48 times "vendor" and 13 times "manufacturer". Please
>> revisit this: If there is a