[Anima] ANIMA WG: Dead or Alive: minutes taker!

Hi folks Special recognition promised to whoever is willing to be the notes taker for the ANIMA WG meeting! Pls. let us chairs know! Thanks Toerless ___ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

[Anima] ANIMA / IETF112 agenda -> send slides

Initial IETF112 ANIMA agenda uploaded. Master is on hedgedoc: https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-112-anima I send reminder to those WG document authors that updated their work but didn't send rquests for slots. For everybody, please propose your slides (if any, none needed, talking faces are gr

[Anima] ANIMA-WG: active WG drafts without IETF112 slot requests.

Dear authors of draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy draft-ietf-anima-jws-vouc...@ietf.org I see you progressed the wor on your document since last IETF, but i did not find any request for a slot at IETF112. If this is an error on my side (email mes

Re: [Anima] WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-asa-guidelines-02 Nov. 1st 2021

As a reminder to myself: we need to add a point to the security considerations: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/8TLhWV0NcSOQhKihe-tc5Co1_6g/ Regards Brian On 16-Oct-21 15:53, Toerless Eckert wrote: Dear ANIMA WG This message starts the two-week ANIMA Working Group Last Call to

Re: [Anima] Discussion regarding draft-dang-anima-network-service-auto-deployment

Hi Yujing, [yj] I think use an extra(virtual) domain like the attached diagram is a good idea to solve the problem about different domain ASAs communication. But as you say, there are some security issues we should discuss in more detail. So do you know which draft can involves this problem?