Hi, Toerless,
A bunch of port assignments use TXT records to indicate protocol version or
security algorithm,. Those are all arguably similar to being able to support
multiple protocols.
buddycloud-api, bluevertise, obf, railduino, sparql, spearcat, spearcat,
tbricks, tivo-remote, and tivo-vide
Toerless,
Needless to say, I like this:
And a small GRASP daemon using the same DTLS as BRSKI is equally simple to
develop
(i claim) as a proxy daemon. Certainly a completely different ballpark than
trying to get network layer IP multicast
However, in fairness, the part of GRASP tha
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 01:22:33PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> I am saying that the existing GRASP M_FLOOD specified in RFC8995,
>
> and I'm saying that we'd have:
>$transport-proto /= IPPROTO_UDP ; ...
Agreed.
> GRASP DULL is easy.
> In some sense, for IoT networks, there is *only*
Peter, Michael *:
Wrt to seervice discovery in general: I am happy to help with the text,
but lets first agree on the functionality.
Here is what i think, please reject points if you have arguments against them,
otherwise i'd assume you agree ;-):
1. "AN_join_registrar" and "AN_Proxy" where defi
On 03-May-22 05:22, Michael Richardson wrote:
Toerless Eckert wrote:
> (1)
>> Yes, you are right, we need to have a new objective to announce.
>> I guess that we don't really think about the constrained-join-proxy
really
>> being used in an ACP context, but we really shoul
Toerless Eckert wrote:
> (1)
>> Yes, you are right, we need to have a new objective to announce.
>> I guess that we don't really think about the constrained-join-proxy
really
>> being used in an ACP context, but we really should that right.
> I don't think this is true. As
Changed accordingly.
Also objective value is used instead of objective name.
Peter
Michael Richardson schreef op 2022-04-29 18:07:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 26-Apr-22 19:02, Peter van der Stok wrote:
HI,
To add to the discussion, below the text that I adapted for Graps
discovery
in cont
