Hi Michael,
You can use augment-structure to extend a yang structure.
-邮件原件-
发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Michael Richardson
发送时间: 2023年1月12日 2:18
收件人: anima@ietf.org; net...@ietf.org
抄送: c...@ietf.org
主题: [netmod] CORE-SID and SX:structure and draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and
Approach WG of the IETF.
Title : A Voucher Artifact for Bootstrapping Protocols
Authors : Kent Watsen
Michael Richardson wrote:
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-01
> * I have revised the ietf-voucher YANG module to use sx:structure
(RFC8971)
> rather than YANG-DATA (RFC8040). I seem to
TL;DR> we can not use augment to get the behaviour that we want of being to
extend existing YANG modules with new attributes. We have to revise
8366 each time we want extend things. This email details the work to
make that occur.
internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> Title
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and
Approach WG of the IETF.
Title : A Voucher Artifact for Bootstrapping Protocols
Authors : Kent Watsen
It's important for a JP not to switch to a new preferred Registrar in the
middle of a Pledge "session" (i.e. an active TLS or DTLS connection with
Registrar).
For a stateful JP, it would be easy to keep state of the selected Registrar:
e.g. any Pledge packet coming from same link-local IPv6 add
Hi all,
I just uploaded the updated version of BRSKI-PRM with the following changes:
* Update of list of reviewers
* Issue #67, shortened the pledge endpoints to prepare for constraint
deployments
* Included table for new endpoints on the registrar in the overview of the
registrar-a
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and
Approach WG of the IETF.
Title : BRSKI with Pledge in Responder Mode (BRSKI-PRM)
Authors : Steffen Fries
Hi Reshad,
A while ago you did the early YANGDOCTORS review of BRSKI-AE. You identified
some issues to be addressed. Meanwhile we have split the draft to better focus
on distinct functionality. The result is BRSKI-AE
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae/) and BRSKI-PRM
(