[Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-grasp-12: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-anima-grasp-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-grasp-12: (with COMMENT)

Thanks for the response! Comments inline: Ben. > On May 22, 2017, at 11:07 PM, Brian E Carpenter > wrote: > > Again cherry-picking in line, as I'm on vacation travel this week: > > On 23/05/2017 13:25, Ben Campbell wrote: >> Ben Campbell has entered the following

Re: [Anima] WG input needed: Ben Campbell's question on GRASP (1)

> On May 28, 2017, at 10:59 PM, Brian E Carpenter > wrote: > > On 23/05/2017 13:25, Ben Campbell wrote: > ... >> -7, Grasp Message and Options table: Why "Standards Action"? Would you >> expect some harm to be done if this were only Spec Required? >

Re: [Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-grasp-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi, thanks for the responses. Further comments below. I deleted sections that seem resolved. Thanks! Ben. > On May 28, 2017, at 11:16 PM, Brian E Carpenter > wrote: > > Comments on some more of Ben's comments: > > On 23/05/2017 13:25, Ben Campbell wrote: >&

Re: [Anima] WG input needed: Ben Campbell's question on GRASP (2)

> On May 28, 2017, at 11:02 PM, Brian E Carpenter > wrote: > > On 23/05/2017 13:25, Ben Campbell wrote: > ... >> - Is section 2 [Requirements] expected to be useful to implementers once >> this is> published as an RFC? Unless there's a reason otherwise, I

[Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-voucher-06: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-anima-voucher-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-06: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-06: (with COMMENT)

Just to close the loop: All of Brian’s responses look fine to me. Thanks! Ben. > On Dec 14, 2017, at 12:42 PM, Brian E Carpenter > wrote: > > On 14/12/2017 17:20, Ben Campbell wrote: > ...> - On my first reading, I wondered why this was informational. It seems > to s

[Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-07: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-07: (with COMMENT)

On Jan 10, 2018, at 7:51 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote: > > Thanks, Adam, i had overlooked the "or understandding the content" first > time i've been round the block! Thanks also to Adam for explaining my point before I got to it :-) A sometimes useful thought experiment is whether you think a norm

[Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-16: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-16: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however

[Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-08: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-08: (with COMMENT)

> On Oct 24, 2018, at 8:10 PM, Brian E Carpenter > wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > On 2018-10-25 12:08, Ben Campbell wrote: > > >> Thanks for the work on this. I just have one editorial comment: >> >> - Several sections describe themselves as being f

Re: [Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-08: (with COMMENT)

s, from a language point of view there is > redundancy, but at least we're being very clear. > > Michael > > > On 25/10/2018 04:33, Ben Campbell wrote: >> >>> On Oct 24, 2018, at 8:10 PM, Brian E Carpenter >>> wrote: >>> >>&g

Re: [Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-08: (with COMMENT)

erred on the more >>> "explicit" wording, trying to make REALLY sure everybody understands what's >>> in scope for phase 1 or not. >>> >>> Unless you have a real concern at some specific points, I would prefer to >>> not open those de