Join proxy is ok with me.
I find the "Join Registrar" a bit weird, to me "Registrar" itself
is pretty clear in its purpose. But, never mind, main thing is we
use the same terms everywhere.
I don´t really like the term "router" for the proxy. To me
Join Router is wrong. It forwards messages not packets. Maybe its next
name should be Join Middlebox, but I'm happy with Join Proxy.
Yes it forwards the message, and IP-in-IP routes the packets.
I prefer router because it makes it clear that the end to end transport
is unbroken from pledge t
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> So, are you going to stop changing the names now? Because each time you
> change them, I have to update draft-carpenter-anima-ani-objectives but
> more seriously my demo code too...
"me"?
I didn't know I was authoritative for WG consensus :-)
> Join Rou
So, are you going to stop changing the names now? Because each
time you change them, I have to update draft-carpenter-anima-ani-objectives
but more seriously my demo code too...
Join Router is wrong. It forwards messages not packets. Maybe its next
name should be Join Middlebox, but I'm happy with
Michael, some comments driven by the slides:
We changed the name from Join Assistant to Join Proxy, as a consistent
name across netconf,anima and 6tisch.
(Peter wants us to change it to Join Router, because it forwards
packets... but...)
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv
