At my current shop we're trying to clean up the display of secrets in
Ansible output. The standard recommendation, using "no_log" in the
playbook, isn't good for our environment, as we have many playbooks that
don't use it and would require a lot of manual review just to find all the
spots that
Alternatively you can actually do an inline Jina loop. e.g.
- name: Save the output
local_action:
module: copy
content: |
{% for item in result.results %}
{{ item.stdout }}
{% endfor %}
dest: /root/info.txt
On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 at 7:50 AM, marcindulak wrote:
>
>
>
> Since you are saving to a fil
me fact for each host. You can pull out
whatever fact it is you want from the other hosts.
Hope that helps
Ed
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 at 3:39 AM, belajzus wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> I need to generate some file, and inside that file is some content from
> multiple hosts.
> I've don
king/aws_config and checking that the tests do pass with these
permissions.
I'm assuming that a PR with a failed build and needs_revision tag is just
going to be ignored. If these are reviewed anyway then I'll just explain
the context in the PR description.
Thanks in advance
Ed
--
integration test was not actually running
in the shippable build and the move to group 4 has enabled it, which is why
I'm now getting failures.
Any help on how to update these permissions would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Ed
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
I hit a similar issue a while back and found
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/24987 which explains why
refresh_inventory doesn't cover this case.
Based on that, I ended up using include_vars to explicitly include the
variables onto the hosts after creating the yml file. E.g.
- hosts: loc
Hi Oscar,
This is not ansible specific but I believe that you can achieve what you
want using SSH connection sharing and proxies.
I haven't tested this exact scenario but use something quite similar with
key authentication via a jump-server. In short:
1) in your inventory configure your destinati
and raise it at a public core meeting as Jon suggested.
1:
https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/master/ISSUE_HELP.md#when-will-your-pull-request-be-merged
2: https://docs.python.org/3.6/library/json.html#json.loads
Cheers
Ed
On Sat, 11 Nov 2017 at 7:25 PM, Andy Pi
wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
>
st it if necessary.
I know this is a very busy project, so just hoping to get an idea of how long
it typically is before new module PRs like this get looked at.
Thanks
Ed Costello
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ansible Development&
is, warning-free, in
2.3? Is there a filter I can use to do evaluation? For maintenance
reasons, I'd like to avoid building a distinct task for each case.
Simple example below.
Thanks,
Ed
$ cat inventory
one ansible_connection=local
$ cat play.yml
---
- hosts: all
tasks:
- d
wo]
NO MORE HOSTS LEFT
*
to retry, use: --limit @/home/centos/play.retry
PLAY RECAP
*
one : ok=1changed=0unreachable=0failed=1
two
"source": 1,
"sourceId": 788478,
"ttl": 3600,
"type": "TXT",
"value": "\"v=spf1 mx a LIST_OF_IP_ADDRESSES
include:servers.mcsv.net include:amazonses.com
inclu
12 matches
Mail list logo
