Le 14/01/11 09:20, rektide claviotta :
only about 50% of the respondents wanted to keep the mailing list. This
implies strongly that switching away from the mailing list would be a
potentially positive thing.
Ugg. I really don't look forward to some crappy forum software being
the
+1(00)
On Jan 14, 2014 10:03 AM, Guillaume Subiron maet...@subiron.org wrote:
Le 14/01/11 09:20, rektide claviotta :
only about 50% of the respondents wanted to keep the mailing list. This
implies strongly that switching away from the mailing list would be a
potentially positive
I have this line
LogFormat { \@timestamp\: \%{%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%z}t\, \@fields\:
{ \client\: \%a\, \duration_usec\: %D, \status\: %s, \request\:
\%U%q\, \method\: \%m\, \referrer\: \%{Referer}i\, \vhost\:
\%v\ , \responsebytes\: \%B\} } log_json
in a template .j2 file
I want it to pass
Hi,
What would be the best way to set ansible_python_interpreter for almost 50%
of the hosts in the inventory for ad-hoc ansible command. what i did is i
grouped them under one group in the inventory [python27:children] and have
set the vars for this group [python27:vars]
You could write your own lookup plugin.
I think it would be very important to have the existing continue to require
the key, to avoid confusing errors in the case of typo'ing the key and not
getting any results.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:54 PM, John Meredith jo...@psynix.com wrote:
Hi,
I
This would be a fine way to do it.
I'd probably just associate it with a group named after the OS if that were
me, but maybe it's not OS specific in your case.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Walid walid.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
What would be the best way to set
Hi Michael,
that is what i have done eventually, created a group for RHEL5 and add the
possible groups that use rhel5 under it to get the variable.
thanks,
W.
On 14 January 2014 16:26, Michael DeHaan mich...@ansibleworks.com wrote:
This would be a fine way to do it.
I'd probably just
Ansible is designed to work this way intentionally as it's quite useful for
inter-machine orchestration and extremely useful for fine grained control
when we want to do things like work with load balancers.
You might possibly want to consider invoking ansible-pull (or just ansible
in local mode)
For information of other users, RHEL 5 should be fine if you just install
python-simplejson for usage of most modules.
However if you have python27 installed that's good too :)
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Walid walid.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
that is what i have done
Any chance on having this fixed in trunk or has a reason shown up for not
changing it?
We simply remove the result['changed'] = True line and so far I've not seen
any adverse affects but it's a little annoying to patch each time on
upgrade.
On Wednesday, 22 May 2013 16:40:42 UTC+1, Michael
Hi Serge,
This worked great, thank you. I didn't realize that you could use the
with_* functions with lookup(), now things makes a lot more sense.
Best regards,
/Martin
Something like this might work:
- name: Copy zone files
copy: src={{
lookup('first_found', ['path/to/zones/' +
Hi Serge,
This worked great. I didn't realize that you could use the with_* functions
with lookup(), now things makes more sense. Thank you!
Best regards,
/Martin
Something like this might work:
- name: Copy zone files
copy: src={{
lookup('first_found', ['path/to/zones/' +
item
group_by should definitely report changed when it adds new things to new
groups.
Also: this thread is 10 months old :)
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Ryan rya...@gmail.com wrote:
Any chance on having this fixed in trunk or has a reason shown up for not
changing it?
We simply
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 5:45:09 AM UTC-8, Michael DeHaan wrote:
syslog: {% if ansible_distribution_version|truncate(1,true,'') = '6'
%}rsyslog{% else %}syslog{% endif %}
That's super gross IMHO... I would not want to see that in *anyone's*
playbooks as that goes against much of the
Oh I'm not offended, don't worry about that. I'm just suggesting
(especially for new comers on the list), that it's better to try to
simplify first than resort to Jinja in most cases -- I like to use it to
insert variables and occasionally loop in templates, but limit it to just
that whenever
Not really.
You can do:
ansible-playbook one.yml; ansible-playbook two.yml
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Shai Israel s...@bigpanda.io wrote:
Hi,
I need to run cleanup tasks at the end of the playbook, no matter what the
results of the other tasks.
Is there any way to do it with
You can always add changed_when: False to hide the output, but it's not
really hurting anything.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Stephen Ryan rya...@gmail.com wrote:
Thought it would be better to follow up here for the history.
Following the docs and using group_by for distributions to
use ~/.ssh/config to work around this, so that ssh $(somewhere) drops you
right into where you want to be
e.g. for server01 where the non-root user is jboss. You will the private
key for the user jboss on your management box.
$cat config
Host jboss-server01
Hostname server01.fqdn.com
So, I've noticed I have a tendency to do things a little backwards but, I'm
hoping someone can clear something up for me.
Originally, i was using the file/copy module in ansible to copy the
authorized_keys2 file from the ansible server to the node in question. A
colleague of mine stated I
The authorized_key module *can* handle multiple keys per file. One per line
as is usual with authorized_keys files.
I do something like:
- name: authorized_keys - Erik
action: authorized_key user=erik key={{ lookup('file', 'pubkeys/erik')
}} manage_dir=yes
...where pubkeys/erik is a file with
Ah great! Thanks for the correction, so currently (and not a huge deal)
the only limitation is no comments.
Thanks again!!
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 3:53:56 PM UTC-5, Erik wrote:
The authorized_key module *can* handle multiple keys per file. One per
line as is usual with authorized_keys
We'reWEWe
We're going to do a small half-day event in Austin, TX before
South-by-Southwest Interactive on 3/06.
Sign up for tickets here: http://t.co/VtIj83ClVl
If you would like to speak, please submit a few paragraph abstracts of your
proposal to c...@ansibleworks.com by 2/14.
--
Michael
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:00 PM, BrianAI brian.a.imbri...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah great! Thanks for the correction, so currently (and not a huge deal)
the only limitation is no comments.
Thanks again!!
You're welcome.
There may very well be a better way to manage things, and if so, I hope
On Monday, January 13, 2014 3:57:52 PM UTC-8, Mark Casey wrote:
No change specifically with ec2.py... it doesn't work on the host where I
wanted to use it, but it does on another host I tried it on.
However, on the host where ec2.py is not working, I thought I'd mention
that I am able to
Thanks for all the great suggestions! Not sure if it will be today but I'll try
them and post back how I get on.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Ansible Project group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
25 matches
Mail list logo
