2014/02/18 19:07:20 [error] 31891#0: *1 connect() to unix:/tmp/pile.sock
failed (111: Connection refused) while connecting to upstream, client:
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, server: localhost, request: GET / HTTP/1.1, upstream:
uwsgi://unix:/tmp/pile.sock:, host:
I am using the groups aproach in some cases, but I can't use it in
pull-mode, can I? The playbook I wrote (with the whens) is to be used in
pull-mode.
Thanks Michael.
El miércoles, 19 de febrero de 2014 14:04:38 UTC+1, Michael DeHaan escribió:
I am using whens because I want to have only one
Just a minor process note -- It's often troublesome to have a discussion
about a feature on github because less people are there to read a ticket.
I'd much prefer we discuss feature ideas here, for most major things,
since that allows greater discussion, and search is also better.
That all being
What you are proposing wouldn't be the ansible-vault CLI, it would probably
need to be a password2 plugin, but the Vault code is totally usable by
the plugin (utils/vault.py) as I've mentioned above.
What *most* people want is the ability to set secrets that are global
across their
Hi All,
Could someone please help with spotting problem in my actions or confirm
that there is a problem in Ansible.
Based on https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/6089
I'm trying to load action plugin from playbook's relative directory
action_plugins
tree
├── action_plugins
│ ├──
Action plugins don't have categories, that is probably it.
-- Michael
On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Dmitry Horbach dim.horb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Could someone please help with spotting problem in my actions or confirm
that there is a problem in Ansible.
Based on
Here's some documentation on set theory filters that may help:
http://docs.ansible.com/playbooks_variables.html#id22
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Stephen Gargan steve.gar...@gmail.comwrote:
I'd like to be able to do the following, hopefully someone can point me to
a simple way to do
On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 1:27:35 PM UTC-5, Adam Morris wrote:
On Monday, February 17, 2014 5:24:45 PM UTC-8, Lorin Hochstein wrote:
Hi all:
I submitted a pull request to implement realtime output:
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/6035/
Since the proposed patch is large,
perfect, thanks Michael
On Feb 18, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Michael DeHaan mich...@ansible.com wrote:
Reading the subject again, here's your answer:
- shell: foo
changed_when: False
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Michael DeHaan mich...@ansible.com wrote:
There's only a snippet of
I'm just getting started with Ansible and trying to get my first SSH
connections working. When I run ansible all -m ping it comes back with
fqdn | FAILED = FAILED: Authentication failed.
How do I dig into the source of that failure? Can ansible find ansible.cfg?
Is my config wrong?
In a bit
I observed similar issue with ec2_group and ec2_vpc (while creating
subnets, route tables, associations, etc.)
On Friday, February 14, 2014 12:35:27 PM UTC-5, Scott Anderson wrote:
Are there other modules that behave in this fashion as well?
If so a generic retry loop that takes a callable
I use roles and testXX/group_vars/all to define a great many things for
each environments.
I have to build xml files that contain two values at least in each
iteration. The example below has pool1 and pool2, and within those pools we
have server1, server2 etc.
I can't get my head around how
We want to use AWS temporary security token (actually anybody not using them
should look into them).
But to make it work with ansible, we need to make a small change to:
lib/ansible/module_utiles/ec2.py
library/cloud/ec2*
do the original authors want to to tackle this, or should I submit a
Hi Michael,
One of the pain points for us often times is the Ansible lack of the
human-readable representability of the output of the task that has been
run. A workaround up to now has been to use the `debug:
var=output.stdout_lines` which while not perfect is at least more bearable
in terms
Sorry, posted wrong output for the multi-item task (too early in the
morning I guess :-). Here's the evidence the multi-item 'results' return
data structure lacks the 'stdout_lines' attribute for the individual items:
TASK: [debug var=post]
I am developing ec2_emr module to mimic elastic-mapreduce cli developed by
Richard@AWS: http://aws.amazon.com/developertools/Elastic-MapReduce/2264
Concerns, objections, functionality request? Besides the module
development guide on Ansible
Docshttp://docs.ansible.com/developing_modules.html
I don't have anything quite this complicated, but I think that you should
be able to do something like this...
pool_list:
- { name: pool1, server_list: {name: server1, hostname: hostname1, },
{name: server2, hostname: hostname2} }
- { name: pool2, server_list: {name: server3,
Nope, just make sure that you use the ec2 common code to handle things like
the authentication tokens/etc. and you should be fine. Just send us the
pull request when it's ready.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Alexander Popov
alexanderpop...@gmail.comwrote:
I am developing ec2_emr module to
I'll create a pull request for the security token in the module_utlis/ec2.py
later tonight.
On 2014-02-20 16:11, James Cammarata wrote:
Nope, just make sure that you use the ec2 common code to handle things like
the authentication tokens/etc. and you should be fine. Just send us the pull
Thanks for the pointer Michael, here's what I ended up doing.
{
combined: [ {{first_list | union(second_list) | join(', ')}}]
}
On Thursday, 20 February 2014 10:27:38 UTC-8, Michael DeHaan wrote:
Here's some documentation on set theory filters that may help:
Pull request would be great.
Look at the common auth systems in module_utils for a way that can be
hopefully done for all modules.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Alexander Popov
alexanderpop...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
-Alex
On Thursday, February 20, 2014 4:37:53 PM UTC-5, Yves Dorfsman
Also, a bit of a follow up, the rvm module that was a pull request (was
this it?) was submitted a very long time ago.
If there is a good need for a module to install rvm, I'm open to it, though
it also seems like maybe shell+async is still the right way to go?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:10 PM,
you have |pprint and |to_nice_json filters to make the output 'human
friendly. I use this on debug: all the time.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Ansible Project group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
23 matches
Mail list logo
