That's disappointing. I'm going to have to re-think my permission scheme.
But thanks for the info.
JW
On Friday, April 25, 2014 2:31:22 PM UTC-7, Brian Coca wrote:
>
> it would require a major change to how template/file/assemble/etc work. In
> template's case the file is actually generated on
Just as a side-note, I was able to get the wait_for mode to work for ssh
with a bit of fiddling (so you don't have to wait with 2 tasks):
- hosts: 127.0.0.1
connection: local
gather_facts: false
vars_files:
- env.yaml
tasks:
- name: Wait for SSH to come up after the reboot
wa
Done! Except I see that the test formatting (*bold*) didn't carry across.
But I think there is still enough information there that someone can figure
out what i meant.
Thanks,
Mark
On Monday, April 21, 2014 4:58:04 PM UTC-7, mto...@go2uti.com wrote:
>
> Is anyone else having issues with th
it would require a major change to how template/file/assemble/etc work. In
template's case the file is actually generated on the master and copied to
the target machine.
ansible tries to make the change as atomic as possible (that is why it
needs write to the dir) to make sure no other process rea
I see, thanks. Could this be considered a bug? There may be cases where you
want a user to have write permission on a file, but not the whole directory.
On Friday, April 25, 2014 2:24:27 PM UTC-7, Brian Coca wrote:
>
> Yes, template writes a new file and moves it into place.
>
>
> --
> Brian C
Yes, template writes a new file and moves it into place.
--
Brian Coca
Stultorum infinitus est numerus
0111011100100110010101101110001001110111011000010110011101010010011100110110110101110111001001110111
Pedo mellon a minno
--
You received this message becau
Hi Michael. My user does have permission to write the file -- he just
doesn't have permission to create files in the parent directory, and
Ansible is complaining about that.
When the "template" task updates an existing file, does it delete and
re-create the file?
JW
On Friday, April 25, 201
Aha. Thanks for being the magic index of all open issues :-)
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/7039 for anyone wondering.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Nope, there's no magic "all" right now. There is already a suggestion
> for this though (and maybe a pull r
Using local ./library content is fine, but please don't run a fork with
extra packages added if you are going to ask questions about them -- or at
least identify that you are when you do.
It can make Q&A very confusing when people ask about things that aren't
merged.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:31
A pull request would be welcome!
Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Hans Lellelid wrote:
> I like the idea of having sftp vs scp be configurable for paramiko. We
> don't use sftp in our infrastructure (except in a few cases), so having an
> scp option for paramiko would be nice. (Lots
The template module will need permissions to be able to write the template,
however the template module is smart enough to not replace the file if the
md5sum of the template has not changed.
IIRC, in some cases of sudo usage from non-root an md5sum isn't possible
and it will need to try to overwri
"Would I need to set sudo=no on the playbook, and then sudo=yes on each
task that needs it?"
This is quite reasonable.
(sudo: no, not sudo=no, BTW)
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Adam Morris wrote:
>
> The simple solution is not not put sudo=anything in the playbook. Those
> users needing
Lookup plugins not raising exceptions is a known issue at the moment --
though I'm not positive there's a ticket. Please see if there is one and
if not please file it.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Scott Anderson
wrote:
> I had to add some try/catch logic in template.py to discover that t
io.c errors are beyond our control as far as I'm aware.
You may wish to just use the recursive copy options instead.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Brian Grossman wrote:
> Both sides are running centos 6.4.
>
> Would that io.c problem apply if rsync by itself works?
>
> Brian
>
> On Wednesd
"However I have confirmed that the locales package is indeed installed."
Is it installed on the remote node? That's where it's needed.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:16 PM, ayounggun wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong? I'm trying to generate and set the
> system's locale wit
Nope, there's no magic "all" right now. There is already a suggestion for
this though (and maybe a pull request).
One option is to tag such steps with "common" and always include common.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Peter Gehres
wrote:
> Is there any way to have something run for all
I like the idea of having sftp vs scp be configurable for paramiko. We
don't use sftp in our infrastructure (except in a few cases), so having an
scp option for paramiko would be nice. (Lots of CentOS 5.x in
infrastructure, so paramiko is still desired.) Here is a custom paramiko
plugin that
On Apr 25, 2014, at 3:08 PM, James Carroll wrote:
> I'm fairly new to Ansible. How do I get your code into my Ansible install so
> I can use it? I run from source.
I keep all of my new/modified modules in a library directory under where my
play books are. Ansible will find the libraries the
I'm fairly new to Ansible. How do I get your code into my Ansible install
so I can use it? I run from source.
Thanks!
James
On Monday, April 21, 2014 12:29:03 PM UTC-4, cove_s wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> We’re trying to implement a system where we can power environments on and
> off AWS whe
On Apr 25, 2014, at 2:31 PM, ghex...@gmail.com wrote:
> So, I'm curious, for the case where you want to start "stopped" EC2
> instances, what's the current recommended approach?
>
> I've kind of ignored this task for now, managing that by hand (it's just
> our dev env, but it's still a c
Is there any way to have something run for all tags? For example,
ec2_facts should always be run when working with hosts in AWS even if you
want to use a tag to limit the tasks that you are running.
--
Peter Gehres
Site Reliability Engineer | AppDynamics, Inc.
www.appdynamics.com | AS62897
--
So, I'm curious, for the case where you want to start "stopped" EC2
instances, what's the current recommended approach?
I've kind of ignored this task for now, managing that by hand (it's just
our dev env, but it's still a couple of dozen instances at least). I'm
almost about to pull Sco
I'm using the "template" task to modify a file that I own, and have write
permissions on. I'm not using sudo; I'm just running it as my own user.
But I get an error "Destination [parent-dir] not writable." I'm guessing
it's deleting and re-creating the file. Is there any way to avoid this, or
d
Mark,
Thanks for digging into the issue. Would you mind updating the github
ticket with this new information?
Thanks!
James
On Thursday, April 24, 2014 12:17:19 PM UTC-4, mto...@go2uti.com wrote:
>
>
> I saved the tmp file on a target server and looked through it to try to
> see what is hap
Hi,
I've open an issue on Github
(https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/7157) about mongo_user module.
I'm trying to use mongo_user to create some users. However, I'm unable to
login with the credentials specified.
I use the following commands :
- name: add Mongo admin
mongodb_user: dat
Anybody able to confirm this pretty please? I also tried:
- name: Initial safe-upgrade of the system (from wheezy-backports)
apt: upgrade=safe default_release=wheezy-backports update_cache=yes
*state=latest*
No matter what I keep getting the "OK" (as if there's nothing to do),
whereas the a m
On 04/25/14 19:52, Adam Morris wrote:
> Which is where you use the "dependency" part for real. Override the
> templates files using ramon's technique and then use Dependency to
> call that task BEFORE you call your own tasks.
Ramon's technique would work great in some cases but would not work if
On 04/25/14 17:48, Strahinja Kustudić wrote:
> I can see your suggestion being useful, but for now, you just have to
> think of roles as group of similar tasks and that is all, don't think
> of them as classes in an OO language. I don't see that this will
> change any time soon.
>
Actually, from u
On Friday, April 25, 2014 12:01:16 AM UTC-7, Ernest0x wrote:
>
>
> What you suggest could be useful only if you just want to override some
> templates and/or files. But you may also want your 'extend' role to have
> some new tasks of its own, so that they are run after the invocation of the
The simple solution is not not put sudo=anything in the playbook. Those
users needing to run with sudo can use command line flags to turn that on...
It sounds like you have two separate sets of tasks... So why not use a
pair of roles?
If you have split your playbooks up into individual tasks
I can see your suggestion being useful, but for now, you just have to think
of roles as group of similar tasks and that is all, don't think of them as
classes in an OO language. I don't see that this will change any time soon.
On Friday, April 25, 2014 4:39:49 PM UTC+2, Ernest0x wrote:
>
> On 0
On 04/25/14 17:09, Strahinja Kustudić wrote:
> You are complicating things with all this, think of it a lot simpler.
> Regarding your example you can solve #1 in two ways:
>
> 1. Don't set hosts file with a template, but using lineinfile
> 2. Don't change the hosts file in common role, since from t
I had to add some try/catch logic in template.py to discover that there was an
issue with the template I was using in lookup('template'). The plugin was just
returning empty string due to the template error.
Are the lookup plugins supposed to eat exceptions?
Regards,
-scott
--
You received t
You are complicating things with all this, think of it a lot simpler.
Regarding your example you can solve #1 in two ways:
1. Don't set hosts file with a template, but using lineinfile
2. Don't change the hosts file in common role, since from the looks of it,
it is not "common" enough
On Frida
No one?
On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 3:34:47 PM UTC+2, Sébastien Han wrote:
>
> I don't know :/
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sébastien Han.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Strahinja Kustudić <
> strahin...@nordeus.eu> wrote:
>
>> I don't understand, it's like it is not recognizing the *hostvars*key
On 04/25/14 13:28, Ramon de la Fuente wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I understand the suggestion about adding more variables to your templates to
> be able to steer with variables; and I understand defaults - this is exactly
> how we try to build roles for galaxy. The problem lies with roles beyond your
> own
Hi,
I understand the suggestion about adding more variables to your templates to be
able to steer with variables; and I understand defaults - this is exactly how
we try to build roles for galaxy. The problem lies with roles beyond your own
control - i.e. roles by other people where you want to
On 04/24/2014 09:53 PM, ra...@future500.nl wrote:
> Hey Ernest0x,
>
> I don't think the dependencies currently stand to mean "extend" in the
> OO sense. All it means is "I depend on some othe role, so make sure
> that role is run before me". Each role is still an independent one. I
> believe this i
38 matches
Mail list logo
