Great, thanks!
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 6:41 PM, John Oliver wrote:
> Thanks. I've asked the maintainer of that port at MacPorts to update, or
> if I can help maintain it.
>
>
> On Monday, August 4, 2014 1:17:15 PM UTC-7, Michael DeHaan wrote:
>>
>> Ok, so the various security fixes in the 1.6
Thanks. I've asked the maintainer of that port at MacPorts to update, or
if I can help maintain it.
On Monday, August 4, 2014 1:17:15 PM UTC-7, Michael DeHaan wrote:
>
> Ok, so the various security fixes in the 1.6.X series were largely patched
> out by 1.6.10, and are even better on the develo
Ok, so the various security fixes in the 1.6.X series were largely patched
out by 1.6.10, and are even better on the development branch, where we are
finishing up some minor things getting ready for a release.
Please check and see if this is an issue in 1.6.10, and my expectation is
there's a good
1.6.6
On Monday, August 4, 2014 10:22:44 AM UTC-7, Michael DeHaan wrote:
>
> For starters,
>
> ansible --version ?
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ansible Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an em
For starters,
ansible --version ?
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Mike Ray wrote:
> I can't say as I'm familiar with the nested construction, but at least
> part of the problem is given to you:
>
>
> *msg: this module requires key=value arguments*
> (['dest=/etc/pam.d/system-auth-ac',
> 'r
I can't say as I'm familiar with the nested construction, but at least part
of the problem is given to you:
*msg: this module requires key=value arguments*
(['dest=/etc/pam.d/system-auth-ac', 'regexp=^auth.*pam_faillock\\.so\\
auth.*\\ deny=3\\ unlock_time=604800\\ fail_interval=900',
'inserta
