ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > oops - I just committed last patch ;/
> >
> > I have no idea on PVCS so if someone who knows more could
> > check out your
> > patch ?
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:47, sp-ota wrote:
> > > I also sent a patch to
I also sent a patch to the list available from the following link.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09475.html
I believe this patch is better because it eliminates I/O and avoid
unnecessary filtering.
As a matter of fact, I've been very wondering why the previous author and
every
1. Bug fix
the orignal version failed to create directories before fetching files.
2. IO bound process to CPU bound process
the orignal used mkdirs() for each entry of returned file list. Instead,
use Hashtable
to eliminate possible path to create and reduce the number of mkd
Hello.
Can someone answer to my question?
Why not are "**/RCS", "**/RCS/**", and "**/*,v" in DEFAULTEXCLUDES
in DirectoryScanner.java?
Since it ignores cvs and sccs files, is it more natual to ignore rcs files,
too?
And I think it will be nice to have a list of
Hello.
I am sending this message to both ant-dev and ant-user.
By the way, are the authors of Pvcs in this mailing list?
I use ANT_14_BRANCH of Aug. 14th., Sun JDK 1.4-beta,
Windows2000 Japanese edition, and PVCS 6.6.
I have a project containing sub-directories and lo
