Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We could have an encoding parameter; default to UTF8 for the sake of > consistency with build files themselves. Or default to local? local seems the more natural choice - and is consistent with other tasks that read from files. Ste

Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-11 Thread Steve Loughran
- Original Message - From: "Jose Alberto Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:34 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo >>From: "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PR

Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-10 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
From: "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > We could have an encoding parameter; default to UTF8 for the sake of > consistency with build files themselves. Or default to local? hmmm. My > preference is UTF8. If the user has an alternative, it could be stated > How many files in your file syst

Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-10 Thread Steve Loughran
- Original Message - From: "Magesh Umasankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:24 AM Subject: Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo >>On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 Diane Holt wrote : >> Change &

Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-10 Thread Peter Donald
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 03:27, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 10 Dec 2001, Magesh Umasankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What about mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-10 Thread Magesh Umasankar
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 Diane Holt wrote : > Change "name" to "property", and it's now consistent Fair enough. +1 for Magesh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-10 Thread Diane Holt
--- Magesh Umasankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For example, > > > > would be consistent with what the user is used to > instead of > > , to set the property foo. Change "name" to "property", and it's now consistent with tasks like and -- tasks that set a property based on the result of s

Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-10 Thread Magesh Umasankar
From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Peter's gonna kill you 8-) :-) > When we discussed this for Ant2 (it is on the list), > his point was (and he's right BTW) that we're already > overloading too much. Adding a nested > element to property may be something different. I was't aware

Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-10 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 10 Dec 2001, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (and he's right BTW) That was supposed to be IMHO, not BTW - I really should use less acronyms. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-10 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 10 Dec 2001, Magesh Umasankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-10 Thread Magesh Umasankar
From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > and have the property > > bound to the contents of the file. > > +1 What about mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-10 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had this irresistible urge to print the output of a program to the > screen. You're not the only one . > and have the property > bound to the contents of the file. +1 Stef

Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-07 Thread Magesh Umasankar
From: "Magesh Umasankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > I had this irresistible urge to print the output of a program to the > screen. > > > > This patch adds a srcFile attribute to Echo; if set the source file is > read > > in (default encoding) and rep

Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-07 Thread Magesh Umasankar
From: "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I had this irresistible urge to print the output of a program to the screen. > > This patch adds a srcFile attribute to Echo; if set the source file is read > in (default encoding) and replaces the message test,. +1 > I am not actually sure if this

Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-04 Thread Steve Loughran
- Original Message - From: "Magesh Umasankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:21 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo > From: "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: [PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-04 Thread Magesh Umasankar
From: "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I had this irresistible urge to print the output of a program to the screen. Why? ;-) Magesh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

[PATCH] srcFile to echo

2001-12-04 Thread Steve Loughran
I had this irresistible urge to print the output of a program to the screen. This patch adds a srcFile attribute to Echo; if set the source file is read in (default encoding) and replaces the message test,. I am not actually sure if this is the best approach. A more general purpose approach woul