Jimmy Sieben wrote:
> Andto get on-topic,. has anyone written a NetBeans module to
> use Ant for building? :)
Why as a matter of fact someone has! :-) ant.netbeans.org. Jayme Edwards
submitted it. I've only played with it so far, but it looks rather nice:
shows you the tree structure
Maybe there should be an 'Expect' language type task created.Has Expect
been ported to Java?
Josef.
- Original Message -
From: Brian M. Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 7:55 PM
Subject: cvs task - BufferedRe
At 10:46 PM 7/14/2000, you wrote:
> Slightly off-topic,
> But if I were to write a Java library, and I wanted to ensure that
> mods to the library must be distributed, but that any application that
> makes use of it (through dynamic or static linking) would not, which
> license would I wan
> Slightly off-topic,
> But if I were to write a Java library, and I wanted to ensure that
> mods to the library must be distributed, but that any application that
> makes use of it (through dynamic or static linking) would not, which
> license would I want to use?
The MPL would be my cur
At 09:00 PM 7/14/2000, you wrote:
That's one interpretation. The license is painfully unclear in this
regard, and there's no precedent from any court case to back up any
interpretation. You'd have to convince a judge that making hard-coded
reflection calls was somehow fundamentally different than
> >Java doesn't do any linking at all either; it simply loads classes in at
> >runtime and then executes the desired methods, right? So why do we need to
> >reflect all the calls?
>
> Well technically all code that uses name of method or class is considered
> to be statically linked even if it is
At 08:28 14/7/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Java doesn't do any linking at all either; it simply loads classes in at
>runtime and then executes the desired methods, right? So why do we need to
>reflect all the calls?
Well technically all code that uses name of method or class is considered
to be statical
> "JS" == James Sieben writes:
JS> ObLicensingQuestion: Regarding jCVS, why does GPL require we
JS> reflect each method call?
The only answer I can give come from second or third hand knowledge,
sorry. I've been tolde that GPL's point of view with regard to Java is
that calling methods dir
---
Jimmy Sieben
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ericsson Texas R&D
EUS/SO/ED
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 1:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvs task - BufferedReader code in Exec.
14. Juli 2000 01:56
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: cvs task - BufferedReader code in Exec.java
>
>
> Hey all. I apologize if this is a huge letter, but I need all the space
> to specify our problem. In using the cvs task in our build.xml, I've ran
> into a curio
> "BMK" == Brian M Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BMK> Any workarounds (I've tried a few with no success)?
You only need to login once if you never logout again, so you could do
cvs login from the shell and don't use it inside Ant at all. This is
for a workaround, not a solution of cou
Hmmm good idea. It would be nice to have be able to have a
ant:interactive="true"attribute in any appropriate target. I have been
bitten a few times before too :P.
Cheers,
Pete
*--*
| "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want |
| to
Hey all. I apologize if this is a huge letter, but I need all the space
to specify our problem. In using the cvs task in our build.xml, I've ran
into a curious annoyance, having to do with the cvs login command. So, we
have in our build file something like:
...
Upon ant's execu
13 matches
Mail list logo
