Use "location" instead of "value" in your property task. It will
normalize the path and also document that you are dealing with files
instead of arbitrary strings.
Here's an example:
buildDir-value = ${buildDir-value}
buildDir-location = ${buildDir-location}
InstallShieldComp
Cheers.
Just want to document the fact that running a FilterReader on a file adds a
final EOL if one does not exist. I Noticed this when working with the Junits
for filters. Remove the final EOL from both the "expected" and "input" files
and the JUnits fail.
If someone considers this a bug, we
Jesse Stockall wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 07:33, Mike Morris wrote:
>
>>which does /not/ delete "*~" files as I woudl have expected. On RTFMing
>>I surmise that it is because "*~" is one of the defaultexclude patterns.
>> So I /could/ turn off defaultexcludes, but then would have to add
>>
Have you looked at in ? --DD
-Original Message-
From: Rosendahl Sten - stro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:02 AM
To: 'Ant Users List'
Subject: expanded properties
I am trying to put a unexpanded classpath (with property expressions such as
${product.home
Try the task. Then you don't have to remember to put the right separator
in when defining properties.
/mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephenson, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 6:27 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Path question
>
>
>
Oops - the subject has now been changed to reflect
the correct release version. Nasty cut-n-paste
mistake - sorry.
Cheers,
Magesh
***
* Yawn: The only time some married men ever *
* get to open their mouth. *
*
This is to announce that Jakarta Ant-Dev has released
Version 1.5.1 of Apache Ant, a Java-based build tool.
The release is available in binary and source forms
at http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-ant/release/v1.5.1/
The changes between the last release and this one
are also highlighted t
- Original Message -
From: "Stephenson, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ...
> F:\Development/Builds/1.0.0.0/ISComponents
>
> But the program I'm calling doesn't like the forward-slash - it want's
> Backslashes, ie.:
>
> F:\Development\Builds\1.0.0.0\ISComponents
>
> Is there some way I can
Thank you. I will install and let you know.
cheers,
M Damon Hill
Integrator : TURBO/Jets
Valtech Technoloies, Inc.
"Science is built up of facts, as a house is built of stones; but
an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones
is a house." - Henri Poincare
>>> [EMAIL PR
Just be aware that the constructor is called way early, when JUnit is
building the test suite of all the tests. It may not matter with
/, but it does with the text TestRunner
(junit.textui.TestRunner).
Either use junit.extensions.TestSetup, or more easily ensure yourself the
initialization happen
- Original Message -
From: "Damon Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ** High Priority **
>
> Is there a time frame as to when Ant 1.5.1 will become an "official"
> release as opposed to the
> "beta" release as it is referred to on the website??
>
> The reason I am asking is because it is lab
Martin,
Typically you want to assign properties which specify paths with the
location attribute:
This will assign the property the appropriate canonical filename for host
os.
I am working on a filter that will adjust paths specified in a property file
in the same way and hope to make it avail
Is there a time frame as to when Ant 1.5.1 will become an "official" release as
opposed to the"beta" release as it is referred to on the website??The reason I am
asking is because it is labeled as Beta on the website however, the company thatI work
for needs the fixes in 1.5.1 (the inheriting
try using the "location" attribute of . i.e.
--
knut
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephenson, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 3. Oktober 2002 15:27
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Path question
>
>
> Hi all
>
> I have a property called "b
** High Priority **
Is there a time frame as to when Ant 1.5.1 will become an "official"
release as opposed to the
"beta" release as it is referred to on the website??
The reason I am asking is because it is labeled as Beta on the website
however, the company that
I work for needs the fixes in 1
Hi all
I have a property called "buildDir" setup as follows:
And I also have a property "InstallShieldComponentsDir"
Now, I'm calling a batch file, which in turn calls a program with takes the
Path stored in "InstallShieldComponentsDir"
My problem is that "InstallShieldComponentsDir" has t
P. Fleury wrote:
> Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
>> Correct. This is just the way JUnit works (regardless of it being run
>> from Ant or otherwise). setUp(), testXXX, tearDown() setUp(),
>> testZZZ(), tearDown() - that is the JUnit-way, call setUp(), then a
>> test method, then tearDown() repeat
P. Fleury wrote:
> ... if I create a TestSuite giving it the MyBigTest.class, it will
> actually create the big object 3 times for my three test functions!
> I though that the setUp() and tearDown() methods were here for exactly
> that purpose. If not, what are they here for ? :-)
The setUp() m
Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Correct. This is just the way JUnit works (regardless of it being run
> from Ant or otherwise). setUp(), testXXX, tearDown() setUp(),
> testZZZ(), tearDown() - that is the JUnit-way, call setUp(), then a
> test method, then tearDown() repeatedly.
>
> Erik
>
Mmm.
Correct. This is just the way JUnit works (regardless of it being run
from Ant or otherwise). setUp(), testXXX, tearDown() setUp(),
testZZZ(), tearDown() - that is the JUnit-way, call setUp(), then a test
method, then tearDown() repeatedly.
Erik
otisg wrote:
> I believe that's n
20 matches
Mail list logo
