At 05:50 30/11/2001 -0500, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Ant users are very fortunate to have a crew of committers that put their
foot down and prevent many seemingly useful features from making it into
Ant's core - and Ant is sufficiently extensible such that folks that wish to
break the rules can do so
Quick question: Are you relying on available's back door to changing
property values?
[ ] Yes
No need to reply if the answer is No - I'm just looking for folks that
are.
If yes, could you please elaborate on how/why you are doing so?
And if you don't know what this question refers to,
of checks based on
available that set up portions of the build to fail if resources are
not available.
Cheers,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [POLL] property immutability hacks
Boy have you let the cat out of the bag now! I never thought about
using the available task this way, the ideas that gives me...
And now you want to remove it?! ;)
--- Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick question: Are you relying on available's back door to
changing
property values?
a series of checks based on
available that set up portions of the build to fail if resources are
not available.
Cheers,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [POLL] property immutability
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:47:24AM -0500, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Quick question: Are you relying on available's back door to changing
property values?
There's a backdoor? Cool!! How do I use it?
;)
But seriously, I've never seen a project with greater disparity between
what users want (perl),
It's called OpenSource !
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [POLL] property immutability hacks
But seriously, I've never seen a project with greater disparity between
what
