Re: Competition to Ant

2001-06-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Peter Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It should be noted that in order to make this work as cleanly as it > does I needed to patch ant in a couple of ways: > > 2. fix to use it's "dir" value instead of the > tar's basedir Just clarify: this is bug of Ant 1.3 that has been fixed in CVS. St

RE: Competition to Ant

2001-06-20 Thread Viraj Purang
Vogel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 10:27 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Competition to Ant It's more a matter of "complex" as Peter D. suggested, and, in most of the cases where there is "complexity" to deal with, it is a matter of

RE: Competition to Ant

2001-06-20 Thread Peter Vogel
built. It would be even cleaner with a :-) -Peter > -Original Message- > From: Larry V. Streepy, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:26 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Competition to Ant > > > Probably shouldn'

RE: Competition to Ant

2001-06-20 Thread Peter Vogel
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Competition to Ant > > > Is anyone aware of any competition to Ant as a build tool? > > Thanks > > Mehmood >

RE: Competition to Ant

2001-06-19 Thread Jim Jackl-Mochel
that we have been able to automate what we have as quickly as we did. Jim JM > -Original Message- > From: Larry V. Streepy, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 12:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Competition to Ant > > > Pro

RE: Competition to Ant

2001-06-19 Thread Jesse Tilly
Jim Jackl-Mochel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Competition to Ant > > > Hmm. Sorry if I stepped on toes. Let me see if I can qualify it a bit. > > I have not used jmake. I took someone elses wor

RE: Competition to Ant

2001-06-19 Thread Jim Jackl-Mochel
for the ultimate build tool for large projects but right now ANT is closer to it out of the box for me than JMK Jim JM > -Original Message- > From: Jesse Tilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 11:33 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subjec

Re: Competition to Ant

2001-06-19 Thread Larry V. Streepy, Jr.
D]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:33 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Competition to Ant > > > > > > > > I don't know if they are truly competition but there are jmk > > and jmake. > > Both are small and clean but don&

Re: Competition to Ant

2001-06-19 Thread Peter Donald
From: Jim Jackl-Mochel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:33 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Competition to Ant > > > > > > > > I don't know if they are truly competition but there are jmk > > and j

RE: Competition to Ant

2001-06-19 Thread Jesse Tilly
heh. I think Peter V. would disagree with that "suitable for large projects" statementas would I. MrT > -Original Message- > From: Jim Jackl-Mochel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subjec

Re: Competition to Ant

2001-06-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Mehmood Shaikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is anyone aware of any competition to Ant as a build tool? Sure: make, jam, cons, Amber ... probably more. Stefan

RE: Competition to Ant

2001-06-19 Thread Jim Jackl-Mochel
1 10:36 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Competition to Ant > > > Is anyone aware of any competition to Ant as a build tool? > > Thanks > > Mehmood

Competition to Ant

2001-06-19 Thread Shaikh, Mehmood
Is anyone aware of any competition to Ant as a build tool? Thanks Mehmood