Re: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent?

Title: RE: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent? Hi Don,   You should have a look at : http://jakarta.apache.org/cvsweb/index.cgi/jakarta-commons/cactus/conf/sample/conf/test/servlet22/resin12/resin.conf?rev=1.1&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup which makes use of a runse

RE: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent?

Title: RE: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent? I took a quick look at cactus but it appears to be more of a unit test tool, not a launcher.  Although I am very interested in a more generic launching process like the fellow mentioned below. thanks, don. -Original

Re: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent?

Sean McNamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Question: Since multithreading of targets as you've described it > still wouldn't address the issue of executing completely standalone, > non-returning processes, is this something that will be addressed in > another way? Having a detach attribute (or s

Re: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent?

On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 01:11, McNamara, Sean (Contractor) wrote: > Thanks for your response Stefan. Yes, the misuse of TASK for TARGET was a > mistake, and if my description wasn't correct, my impression of the v2.0 > mutlithreading (based on your description) was. > > Question: Since multithreadin

RE: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent?

simply not understanding? Thanks for your help! -Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 1:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent? Please refer to the commented version <http:/

Re: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent?

Mehmood Shaikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know whats the timeline for Ant2? There is no real timeline, we are still trying to agree on the basic designs - and as the ant-dev community seems to strongly disagree on some points, it could take some time before we are going to reach co

Re: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent?

Please refer to the commented version instead of the "raw" when searching for explanations 8-) Sean McNamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My understanding is that multiple commnads with

RE: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent?

Does anyone know whats the timeline for Ant2? -Original Message- From: McNamara, Sean (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: June 14, 2001 12:20 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent? My understanding is tha

RE: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent?

in parallel can be necessary if you need to start a server to get something done... -Peter > -Original Message- > From: Nasgowitz, Mark (MED, GEMS-IT) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 8:54 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: R

RE: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent?

Title: RE: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent? Isn't intra-task multithreading already possible?  A task could spawn its own worker threads and synchronize on them before returning.  I thought "Multithreaded execution of tasks within the same target" means th

RE: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent?

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 10:54 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent? Thanks.. This is what I cut from the Ant2.0 feature list. [DISC] multithrading * Multithreaded execution of tas

RE: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent?

Thanks.. This is what I cut from the Ant2.0 feature list. [DISC] multithrading * Multithreaded execution of tasks within the same target. [ACCEPTED] * Multithreaded execution of targets. [REJECTED - vetoes by Conor MacNeill, Glenn McAllister and Stefan Bodewig] Since

RE: Ant 1.3 sequence of tasks but would like concurrent?

Looking at the additions for the v2.0 release, it looks like this behavior will be specifically supported, however it's not in the v1.3 release. If you look at the project notes, I believe the feature is titled: "Multi-threading withing a single task" -Original Message- From: Nasg