Peter Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It should be noted that in order to make this work as cleanly as it
> does I needed to patch ant in a couple of ways:
>
> 2. fix to use it's "dir" value instead of the
> tar's basedir
Just clarify: this is bug of Ant 1.3 that has been fixed in CVS.
St
Vogel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 10:27 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Competition to Ant
It's more a matter of "complex" as Peter D. suggested, and, in
most of the cases where there is "complexity" to deal with, it
is a matter of
built.
It would be even cleaner with a :-)
-Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry V. Streepy, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Competition to Ant
>
>
> Probably shouldn'
cons: http://www.dsmit.com/cons
make: http://www.gnu.org/directory/make.html
For Java, ant is currently the best option, with all
its flaws.
-Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Shaikh, Mehmood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 7:36 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
that we
have been able to automate what we have as quickly as we did.
Jim JM
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry V. Streepy, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 12:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Competition to Ant
>
>
> Pro
Jim Jackl-Mochel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Competition to Ant
>
>
> Hmm. Sorry if I stepped on toes. Let me see if I can qualify it a bit.
>
> I have not used jmake. I took someone elses wor
for the ultimate build tool for large projects
but right now ANT is closer to it out of the box for me than JMK
Jim JM
> -Original Message-
> From: Jesse Tilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 11:33 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subjec
D]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:33 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Competition to Ant
> >
> >
> >
> > I don't know if they are truly competition but there are jmk
> > and jmake.
> > Both are small and clean but don&
From: Jim Jackl-Mochel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:33 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Competition to Ant
> >
> >
> >
> > I don't know if they are truly competition but there are jmk
> > and j
heh. I think Peter V. would disagree with that "suitable for large
projects" statementas would I.
MrT
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jackl-Mochel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
Mehmood Shaikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anyone aware of any competition to Ant as a build tool?
Sure: make, jam, cons, Amber ... probably more.
Stefan
I don't know if they are truly competition but there are jmk and jmake.
Both are small and clean but don't have ANT's suitability for large
projects.
Jim JM
> -Original Message-
> From: Shaikh, Mehmood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:36 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROT
12 matches
Mail list logo