The property file is NOT xml, it's in java "properties" format:
name=value
-Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Eaves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 10:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Including property files
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Did a quick search
t;Varnavas, Frank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 1:13 AM
Subject: RE: Including property files
> I missed some of this thread. What was the conclusion?
>
> I had already used the functionality to separate common
> properti
I missed some of this thread. What was the conclusion?
I had already used the functionality to separate common
properties from individual makefiles. I am also using mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 7:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Including property files
Hi
uot;Mark Ashton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:07 AM
Subject: RE: Including property files
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that the file attribute on property
> had to point to a java property file, which doesn't use
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that the file attribute on property
had to point to a java property file, which doesn't use xml syntax. The ant
docs say:
By setting the file attribute with the filename of the property file to
load. This property file has the format as defined by the file u
At 03:55 PM 6/5/01 +1000, Jon Eaves wrote:
>
This is meant to be a standard java properties file not an xml file ;)
Cheers,
Pete
*-*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost
