Re: javadoc get confused by java package running jsdk-1.4

2002-03-15 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Stefan Bodewig : > On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -subpackages options, which is javadoc 1.4 specific :-( > > I don't have the tool docs for 1.4 with me right now, maybe we can > adapt to use that option if it detects JDK 1.4? > > > So i need to

Re: javadoc get confused by java package running jsdk-1.4

2002-03-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -subpackages options, which is javadoc 1.4 specific :-( I don't have the tool docs for 1.4 with me right now, maybe we can adapt to use that option if it detects JDK 1.4? > So i need to test jdk version first, is your friend.

Re: javadoc get confused by java package running jsdk-1.4

2002-03-14 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Stefan Bodewig : > On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyway, and before this is fixed in a next jdk release, any > > workaround idea ? > > You said it worked from the command line (just using a different > command than Ant did). Which command did y

Re: javadoc get confused by java package running jsdk-1.4

2002-03-13 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyway, and before this is fixed in a next jdk release, any > workaround idea ? You said it worked from the command line (just using a different command than Ant did). Which command did you use? You can use instead of with th

Re: javadoc get confused by java package running jsdk-1.4

2002-03-13 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse : [..] > I'll report the bug to javadoc maintainers. Done (http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4646923.html) Anyway, and before this is fixed in a next jdk release, any workaround idea ? Apart changing package names, of course :-) -- Guillaume R

Re: javadoc get confused by java package running jsdk-1.4

2002-03-13 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Stefan Bodewig : > On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > BTW, running javadoc manually works :-) > > Are you sure? Actually, i didn't used the same command. > Try ant -verbose and use the command line Ant would use. Same problem with javadoc 1.4, every

Re: javadoc get confused by java package running jsdk-1.4

2002-03-13 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Jon Skeet : > > Building javadoc is OK with jsdk 1.3.1, but fails with 1.4.0, > > due to javadoc > > confusing package named java with source files. > > I'm not entirely surprised - given that JavaDoc takes the names of > packages, source files or class files, if you've got a package

RE: javadoc get confused by java package running jsdk-1.4

2002-03-13 Thread Jon Skeet
> Building javadoc is OK with jsdk 1.3.1, but fails with 1.4.0, > due to javadoc > confusing package named java with source files. I'm not entirely surprised - given that JavaDoc takes the names of packages, source files or class files, if you've got a package named foo.java, it seems reasonab

Re: javadoc get confused by java package running jsdk-1.4

2002-03-13 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, running javadoc manually works :-) Are you sure? Try ant -verbose and use the command line Ant would use. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: