Thanks a lot Erik. Thats clear now.
Janusz
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 4 September 2002 10:43 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Re: zipping a single file
Yeah, I guess I was a bit unclear. What I'm saying is what it says here:
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 September 2002 9:21 AM
> To: Ant Users List
> Subject: Re: zipping a single file
>
>
> I hate to state the obvious, but you need to set the basedir or provide
> at least
Ok, ok - maybe I am missing the obvious, but I am bit confused now. Didn't
you say in the previous e-mail that the task
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 4 September 2002 9:21 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Re: zipping a single file
I hate to state the obvious, but you need to se
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 2 September 2002 5:10 PM
> To: Ant Users List
> Subject: Re: zipping a single file
>
>
> Andrew van Renen wrote:
>
>>>includes/excludes attributes are merged together with the ones
>>>
>>>>specified by /
al Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 2 September 2002 5:10 PM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Re: zipping a single file
Andrew van Renen wrote:
>> includes/excludes attributes are merged together with the ones
>> >specified by / elements. They require
Andrew van Renen wrote:
>> includes/excludes attributes are merged together with the ones
>> >specified by / elements. They require no further
>> definition, and is a matter of preference to some extent or necessity
>> if you're using if/unless on the elements.
>
>
> So then why did ' family o
I'm +1 for it to go in 1.5.1. --DD
-Original Message-
From: Diane Holt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Re: zipping a single file
--- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2. 'CVS version of Ant
--- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2. 'CVS version of Ant' - so not part of the 1.5 build then. Is it
> > going to be a part of the next release, [...]
> Yes, it will be part of the next release version of Ant, but do not
> hold your breath. It was almost a year between the releas
Andrew van Renen wrote:
> 1. I obviously don't fully understand the 'includes' attribute: the
> manual says "...list of patterns of files" - does that mean then that it
> acts only as a filter and so requires further definitions with
> elements?
includes/excludes attributes are merged togethe
So does that mean that I would have to pull down the latest code from CVS
before I could use it? Is that change going to go into the next release of
Ant (or are there all sorts of bits and pieces that never get out of CVS)?
It also implies that my understanding of the 'includes' attribute is w
Thanks for the response (I have found this newsgroup as a whole to be very
responsive and community-minded). It raises two questions for me:
1. I obviously don't fully understand the 'includes' attribute: the manual
says "...list of patterns of files" - does that mean then that it acts only
a
Yes, but only with the CVS version of Ant. I added a 'file' attribute
to FileSet such that you can now say this:
And it will create the fileset with only that one file. Internally it
does the same thing as the basename and includes, but its much more
pleasant to work with and you d
12 matches
Mail list logo
