On Monday 25 March 2002 13:05 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, stephan beal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you implement both createX() and addX(), createX() is ignored -
>
> One of them is ignored and nobody know which 8-)
>
> Depends on how (in which order) introspection hands
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, stephan beal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you implement both createX() and addX(), createX() is ignored -
One of them is ignored and nobody know which 8-)
Depends on how (in which order) introspection hands the method names
to IntrospectionHelper, which is highly VM depe
On Monday 25 March 2002 12:57 pm, stephan beal wrote:
> On Monday 25 March 2002 12:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Howdy.
> >
> > I've spent a fair amount of time poring over both the source code
> > and the docs, and I'm still a bit confused about how to use the
> > createXXX and addXXX metho
On Monday 25 March 2002 12:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Howdy.
>
> I've spent a fair amount of time poring over both the source code
> and the docs, and I'm still a bit confused about how to use the
> createXXX and addXXX methods for nested elements of a custom
> task.
The following text w
Howdy.
I've spent a fair amount of time poring over both the source code
and the docs, and I'm still a bit confused about how to use the
createXXX and addXXX methods for nested elements of a custom
task. I understand that the ProjectHelper/IntrospectionHandler
classes won't allow me to define n
