Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

2016-03-09 Thread denis
Hi Havard On 09/03/2016 22:02, Havard Eidnes wrote: I would like abuse-c: much more if it were changed in two ways: - permit abuse-c: in inet(6)num: objects - permit abuse-c: to point to a normal person: object, not only role: This boils down to what I thought would have been the better

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

2016-03-09 Thread denis
On 09/03/2016 12:05, Havard Eidnes wrote: I would like abuse-c: much more if it were changed in two ways: - permit abuse-c: in inet(6)num: objects - permit abuse-c: to point to a normal person: object, not only role: This boils down to what I thought would have been the better implementa

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

2016-03-09 Thread Randy Bush
> I would like abuse-c: much more if it were changed in two ways: > - permit abuse-c: in inet(6)num: objects > - permit abuse-c: to point to a normal person: object, not only role: wfm

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

2016-03-09 Thread Havard Eidnes
>> I would like abuse-c: much more if it were changed in two ways: >> >> - permit abuse-c: in inet(6)num: objects >> - permit abuse-c: to point to a normal person: object, not only role: > > This boils down to what I thought would have been the better > implementation all along. > > Strong +1. D